18/03/2026
Why I do 100% Laser Cataract Surgery (FLACS)
By Dr. Ainur Rahman, Consultant Ophthalmologist, Cornea & Refractive Surgeon,
Ara Damansara Medical Centre (ADMC Laser Cataract & LASIK Suite)
This eye is 3 years post-op.
Unaided vision today:
6/6 distance
20/20 intermediate
N3 near
No enhancement.
No rotation.
No complaints of dysphotopsia.
Look carefully at the image.
A 5.5 mm capsulotomy.
Perfectly circular.
Symmetric 360° overlap.
Barely touching the optic edge — exactly as intended.
Three years later, the capsule still dictates the optics.
And this is why I continue to implant multifocal and toric IOLs in almost 98% of my patients. This is why I do FLACS 100%.
Let’s address the uncomfortable question.
Why is the ophthalmology world still convinced that manual capsulorhexis is “consistent enough” for premium lenses?
Manual CCC is:
• Estimated by eye
• Influenced by red reflex
• Affected by fatigue
• Rarely measured post-operatively
• Almost never perfectly circular
We say “around 5.5 mm.”
Premium optics do not understand “around.”
0.3–0.5 mm variation changes effective lens position.
Asymmetric overlap alters capsular contraction forces.
Subtle decentration redistributes diffractive light.
Toric rotational stability depends on symmetric capsular tension.
When dysphotopsia occurs, we blame:
• Neuroadaptation
• Patient personality
• Lens design
Rarely do we ask whether the capsule geometry was precise.
Most FLACS vs manual studies look at:
• BCVA
• Complications
• Endothelial cell loss
That tells us it is safe.
It does not tell us whether it is refractively superior long term.
Three years later:
The cornea has healed.
The wounds are invisible.
The phaco energy is forgotten.
But the capsule remains.
A perfectly centered, perfectly circular, reproducible 5.5 mm capsulotomy is not cosmetic.
It determines:
• Long-term effective lens position
• Stability of multifocal optics
• Rotational stability of torics
• Capsular fibrosis symmetry
• Patient satisfaction
If premium IOLs demand optical precision…
Why are we comfortable with anatomical approximation?
Refractive cataract surgery requires refractive-level geometry.
And geometry, by definition, demands consistency.
This eye is not an exception.
It is the consequence of precision.