02/09/2026
Mindfulness
This is from Sayadaw U Tejaniya, a contemporary Burmese meditation teacher in the Mahasi Sayadaw lineage, known for his particular style of vipassana practice often called "Mind-Watching"
โ teaching that emphasizes ongoing awareness of mental states throughout daily life rather than confining practice to formal seated sessions.
His teaching style is distinctively investigative and non-prescriptive, often built around simple, repeatable questions ("What is the mind doing right now? Is there awareness?").
โ "Do not look for what you want to see; look at what is actually happening"
This targets a specific, subtle trap in meditation practice: approaching awareness with a hidden agenda โ hoping to observe calm, hoping to confirm progress, hoping not to find restlessness, aversion, or boredom.
When meditators do this, they're not actually observing; they're filtering experience through expectation, sometimes unconsciously shaping or interpreting what's noticed to match what they want to find.
U Tejaniya is asking for something harder: honest observation of whatever is actually present, including states that are unwanted, embarrassing, or seem like "bad meditation" โ irritation, dullness, wandering thoughts, self-judgment itself.
โ "Awareness is not about achieving a blank mind"
This corrects a very common misconception about meditation โ that the goal is emptiness, silence, or the absence of thought. U Tejaniya explicitly teaches against this.
Thoughts, emotions, and mental chatter arising isn't a failure of practice or a sign that awareness isn't happening. A "blank mind" isn't the target and chasing it is, in his framework, just another form of wanting a particular outcome rather than being with what's true.
โ "It is about knowing the mind as it is"
This is his actual definition of awareness (often rendered in his teaching as "sati" or simply "knowing mind"): a clear, receptive knowing of whatever mental or physical state is currently present โ including thinking, restlessness, boredom, or resistance itself โ without needing it to be different first.
Awareness here is a relationship to experience (accurate, non-manipulative knowing), not a particular content or state that experience should be manipulated into.