09/06/2026
On the Subject of Broken Promises...
Did you know that the World Health Organization's position on traditional and complementary medicine has often been very different from the attitudes adopted by many medical associations, regulators, and health authorities in countries such as Australia?
A few years ago, I had a fascinating conversation with a representative from the TGA. Although natural health practitioners had been removed from health insurance provider status, I was told they regarded homลopathy as a valuable part of the health system. That stood in stark contrast to the public narrative many of us had been hearing for years.
Likewise, much of what the public believes about the NHMRC report on homลopathy bears little resemblance to what the report actually concluded. A reporting error occurred, the resulting headlines travelled around the world, and despite legal challenges and extensive criticism, the misunderstanding has never truly been corrected.
My own story goes back much further.
In 1990, I attended a post-medical congress function in Perth where I met an extraordinary WHO representative, Lord Stanley Cook. Small in stature but enormous in presence, he was a personal friend of the Royal Family and a passionate supporter of homลopathy. During our conversation, he described a vision already being developed within international health circles.
The plan, he explained, was that by the year 2000, qualified naturopaths and herbalists would be registered alongside general practitioners, while homลopaths and acupuncturists would occupy a registration status comparable to medical specialists.
This was not speculation or wishful thinking; he had been directly involved in discussions leading up to the initiative and spoke of it as a genuine international objective. Governments and institutions, he said, had a decade to prepare.
He also invited me to join a mobile research unit operating between Switzerland and Russia, gathering important data on natural medicine. For personal reasons I declined, a decision that has always remained one of my great "what ifs".
Yet somewhere along the way, the vision stalled...
If you were involved in natural healthcare during the late 1990s and early 2000s, you may remember the growing sense that the momentum towards integration was being systematically dismantled (in Australia it was the Pan crisis, in Europe it was the formation of the EU). What had appeared to be a coordinated international movement simply failed to materialise in many Western nations.
Meanwhile, countries such as Switzerland, Germany, France, Cuba and India continued developing integrative healthcare models, while South Africa moved to formally recognise disciplines including homลopathy. Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States, however, took a very different path.
More than thirty years later, I still find myself wondering what healthcare might look like today if those original plans had been allowed to unfold. Would we have a system that prioritised prevention alongside treatment? One that embraced the strengths of both conventional and natural medicine?
The good news is that the WHO is once again pushing ahead with the integration. This is the topic of my doctoral dissertation and I have to say, the research and information available today is mind-blowing! While media, movies and our existing system would have you believe there is no support, I can tell you that is just not true. You just have to know where to look.