11/08/2026
Having a child who suffered what I believe was vaccination damage has given me a very different perspective on vaccinations and the way we approach them.
I spent years helping my little boy’s body recover. I had to work through what felt like constant detoxing, heavy metal concerns, multiple food intolerances and so many other issues. His childhood was not easy, and as a mother, it was heartbreaking to watch him struggle.
I want to make it very clear: I am not against vaccinations. I have been vaccinated, my husband has been vaccinated, my family and generations before us have been vaccinated, and my child was vaccinated too. I absolutely understand that vaccinations can save lives. But I also believe we need to be able to acknowledge that, in some children, the response can be extremely difficult.
When I was vaccinated as a child, I remember vaccinations being against around seven different viruses. When my son was vaccinated, he received around 50 vaccines over his childhood, and many vaccines contain protection against multiple viruses. For me, this raises an important question: are we sometimes asking too much of a very small developing body at once?
My son was one of those children whose little body, in my experience, simply could not cope with what was happening. He seemed to develop antibodies not only against the viruses he was being vaccinated against — which is what you would want — but also reactions to proteins in foods he was eating around the same periods of vaccination. Suddenly, foods that had never been a problem became a huge issue for him.
He even ended up in hospital following a vaccination. I have documented his reactions day by day because doctors specifically asked me to keep records, so I have a detailed history of what happened.
Thankfully, I eventually found a couple of modalities that I learned to use to support and treat him, and today he is able to live a normal life. I will always be incredibly grateful for that.
Because of everything we went through, I would love to see more openness and research around how individual children respond to vaccinations. I believe that, when there is genuine concern or a child has particular risk factors, we should be willing to look more closely at that individual child before vaccination.
For example, I personally believe it would be worth investigating whether methylation pathways and other individual factors could play a role in how a child responds. There may be children whose bodies process certain substances differently, and I think we should be open to researching this rather than dismissing parents who notice that something is not right.
I also personally feel that we vaccinate against a lot of viruses, sometimes with multiple targets at once, and I think it is reasonable to ask whether every child’s developing body responds to that in exactly the same way.
I am not saying that every reaction is caused by a vaccine, and I am certainly not saying that parents should stop vaccinating their children. Vaccinations can save lives. But I also believe we need to be able to have an honest, compassionate conversation about the children who do experience serious reactions.
Parents who are concerned should be listened to, not immediately dismissed or made to feel like they are against medicine.
My child had a very difficult start because of what we experienced. Luckily, we found a way forward, and he is doing well today.
All I am asking is that we stay open-minded, listen to parents, look at each child as an individual, and continue researching how we can make vaccination as safe as possible for every child.
Because yes, vaccinations can save lives — but when a child has a severe reaction, that child and that family matter too. ❤️
Daniela ❤️🩹
When fear replaces evidence, freedom is always the first casualty.
For years we were told that No Jab No Play was about protecting children.
Yet if you look at Australian mortality data for the decade before the policy was introduced, deaths from many of the diseases covered by the policy were already extremely rare, with several recording no child deaths during that period.
So it’s a fair question to ask…
If unvaccinated children weren’t driving child deaths from these diseases, why was it considered necessary to exclude them from childcare and early education?
The answer many people give is, “Because everyone else was vaccinated.”
If that’s your argument, then you’ve also acknowledged something important. Those existing vaccination levels had already coincided with years of extremely low mortality. So why introduce a policy that punished families who made a different medical decision?
Whether you supported vaccination or not, No Jab No Play wasn’t simply an education policy. It linked access to childcare with a medical choice, creating pressure on families through exclusion rather than informed consent.
Australians deserve to have an honest conversation about whether government should use coercive policies to influence personal medical decisions.
That’s why we’re standing with the Libertarian Party, the HEART Party, and the Australian Vaccination-Risks Network in calling for these laws to be repealed. And we will be hitting NSW Parliament House this November.
This isn’t just about yesterday.
It’s about the next generation.
Because if governments can remove choice whenever fear is politically convenient, then no freedom is truly secure.
Stand for your children. Stand for your grandchildren. Stand for the Australia you want them to inherit.
