Kings Langley Chiropractic Centre

Kings Langley Chiropractic Centre This page is about chiropractic research and clinic related information. Andrew Lyell has been practising in Kings Langley for over 25 years.

He is a member of the Australian Chiropractors Association and Sports Chiropractic Australia.

I was just talking to a patient 2 weeks ago about his recent flare up after an extended lay off from the gym.  He has pr...
20/07/2026

I was just talking to a patient 2 weeks ago about his recent flare up after an extended lay off from the gym. He has progressed quickly with the weights but has run into some tendon issues.
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1EgdJ4Xeph/

Your muscle rebuilds in about three months. Your tendons and cartilage take roughly a year and a half. Your bone, up to two years. Adding 40 grams of whey daily for two weeks doesn't change any of those timelines.

That's the finding from a study published this month in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. The team measured rebuild rates across more than a dozen knee tissues in living older adults using a safe heavy-water tracer. Tissues sampled during routine knee replacement surgery. Half the participants kept their habitual diet. Half added 40 grams of whey daily for 14 days. At the end, the rebuild rates of every tissue were the same in both groups.

The hierarchy was dramatic.
Muscle rebuilt at about 1.2 percent per day. At that rate, your quadriceps theoretically turn over in roughly three months. Synovium, the membrane that lines the joint capsule, rebuilt at 0.8 percent per day. The fat pad behind your kneecap, about 0.5 percent. The cruciate ligaments deep in the knee, about 0.45 percent. The patellar tendon, the femoral cartilage, and the menisci all rebuilt at 0.18 to 0.21 percent per day, putting their full-pool turnover at roughly 1.3 to 1.5 years. Bone rebuilt at 0.12 to 0.21 percent per day across five sites, with the slowest taking up to 2.3 years for a complete cycle.

What this does and does not say.
It does not say protein doesn't build connective tissue. It does. Every tissue in your body depends on dietary amino acids as substrate, and the synthesis rates measured here confirm that all of these tissues are actively turning over. Bone is a living tissue that constantly remodels. Cartilage maintains itself, slowly. Tendons repair from training and from daily mechanical load, slowly.
What the study shows is that for these older adults on their normal diets, adding 40 grams of whey on top for two weeks did not accelerate the rebuild rate of any tissue measured. It is one trial. It is small and short. It cannot rule out effects in people with inadequate baseline intake, or effects that might appear with longer supplementation. What it does establish is that connective tissue synthesis rates are dramatically slower than muscle, and a two-week protein bump does not compress those rates.

That has direct implications for what protein supplementation is and isn't doing.
Protein supplementation is a tool for closing intake gaps and for hitting the per-meal threshold that maximizes muscle protein synthesis after training. It's effective at those goals. People who are not eating enough total protein, or who are not getting enough per meal to drive muscle protein synthesis in older muscle that has lost some sensitivity to amino acids, benefit from supplementation. That's well established and not in dispute.

Protein supplementation is not a connective tissue repair accelerator. Cartilage damage from running mileage, tendon overuse injuries, bone density loss in postmenopausal women, ACL rehabilitation timelines: none of these can be hurried with whey. The biology runs at its own clock speed regardless of how much you put in.

What this means in practice.
For training and recovery, the protein protocol that has actually been shown to work is unchanged. Roughly 1.6 grams per kilogram of body weight per day, spread across three or four meals, each meal hitting at least 0.4 grams per kilogram. Training stimulus and adequate sleep do the heavy lifting on muscle adaptation. Supplemental protein at the meal level helps people hit those thresholds, especially for older adults, vegetarians, and anyone with a small appetite.

For connective tissue, the levers are different. Mechanical load through progressive training is the dominant signal for tendon and ligament adaptation. Resistance training drives bone density gains. Cartilage health responds to weight management and joint loading more than to nutrition. Collagen and vitamin C combined before training has interesting data for tendon collagen synthesis, but the effect sizes are modest. None of these tissues respond meaningfully to a protein bolus in a two-week window the way muscle does after a single training session.

The bigger reframe.
We have been treating tissue protein synthesis like a single dial. The reality is that your body runs many tissue clocks at very different speeds. Muscle is the fast one. Most of what we call "tissue building" outside of muscle takes 1 to 2 years per cycle, not days. When you injure a tendon at 55, the rehab timeline is set by how fast that tendon can lay down new collagen. Mechanical load and time do the work. Adequate protein supports it but doesn't compress the timeline.

Muscle responds to protein on a short timescale. Everything else responds on a long one. The two are not interchangeable.

Houtvast et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 2026
Moore et al., J Gerontol A, 2015
Morton et al., Br J Sports Med, 2018
Bauer et al., J Am Med Dir Assoc, 2013
Shaw et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 2017

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1B32BqX5aF/
15/07/2026

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1B32BqX5aF/

Ten-year follow-up data from the FIDELITY study of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) in patients with symptoms of degenerative meniscal tear found the procedure offered no benefits and was even associated with worse outcomes.

The FIDELITY study used sham APM as the placebo control. The study involved 146 patients, aged 35-65 years, who were randomized during exploratory arthroscopy either to have damaged or loose parts of the meniscus removed, or to a sham procedure where the surgeon mimicked the movements of surgery without removing any tissue.

The 1-year data found no differences between the sham and real surgery groups in patient-evaluated functional outcomes, health-related quality of life, or knee pain after exercise. https://mdsc.pe/4tXumot

Interesting paper on steroid spinal injections and the lack of effectiveness.   There are commonly recommended to patien...
10/06/2026

Interesting paper on steroid spinal injections and the lack of effectiveness. There are commonly recommended to patients even with early stage pain but perhaps it needs a rethink. My observation over the years is that they didn't seem to do much positive or negative.

https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1451029747059011&set=a.545233407638654

๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ง๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐˜๐—ต ๐—”๐—ฏ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜ ๐—ฆ๐—ฝ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—œ๐—ป๐—ท๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€: ๐—”๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—ช๐—ฒ ๐—ฃ๐—ฎ๐˜†๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ฃ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐—ฏ๐—ผ๐˜€?

โ–ช๏ธ Chronic non-cancer spine pain is a massive global health challenge that carries a significant socioeconomic burden.

โ–ช๏ธ To manage this condition, particularly in North America, patients are frequently offered interventional procedures such as epidural steroid injections, facet joint nerve blocks, and radiofrequency ablation.

โ–ช๏ธ However, these procedures are expensive, not curative, and subject to heavily conflicting clinical guidelines.

โ–ช๏ธ A rigorous systematic review and network meta-analysis detailed in the sources evaluated just how effective these common interventions really are.

โ–ช๏ธ By analyzing 81 randomized controlled trials involving 7,977 patients, the sources deliver a sobering conclusion:

๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐— ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—™๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด

โ–ช๏ธ Commonly performed interventional procedures for chronic spine pain provide little to no pain relief or improvement in physical functioning compared to sham (placebo) procedures.

๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—œ๐—น๐—น๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—˜๐—ณ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜†: ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฆ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—บ ๐—˜๐—ณ๐—ณ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜

โ–ช๏ธ Invasive procedures are known to carry large "non-specific" or placebo effects, meaning patients often feel better simply because they underwent a highly medicalized procedure.

โ–ช๏ธ To find the true specific effects of these interventions, the researchers rigorously compared them against sham procedures.

โ–ช๏ธ The review separated chronic spine pain into two distinct categories to assess treatment effectiveness:

๐—”๐˜…๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ฆ๐—ฝ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฒ ๐—ฃ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ป

โ–ช๏ธ Pain localized to the spine itself.

โ–ช๏ธ For this type of pain, there is moderate certainty evidence that epidural injections of local anaesthetic (with or without steroids) and joint-targeted steroid injections provide little to no difference in pain relief compared to a sham procedure.

โ–ช๏ธ Other treatments, like epidural steroid injections or joint-targeted injections of local anaesthetic, also showed little to no difference, though the evidence is of lower certainty.

โ–ช๏ธ Alarmingly, low certainty evidence suggests that intramuscular injections of local anaesthetics combined with steroids might actually increase pain severity.

๐—ฅ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ฟ ๐—ฆ๐—ฝ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฒ ๐—ฃ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ป

โ–ช๏ธ Pain radiating from the spine along a nerve root (such as sciatica).

โ–ช๏ธ For radicular pain, moderate certainty evidence shows that epidural injections of local anaesthetic and steroids, as well as radiofrequency ablation of the dorsal root ganglion, probably result in little to no difference in pain relief.

โ–ช๏ธ Epidural injections of just steroids or just local anaesthetics similarly showed little to no difference, based on low certainty evidence.

๐—ฃ๐—ต๐˜†๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—™๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—›๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐˜€

โ–ช๏ธ Beyond simple pain relief, patients generally seek these procedures to improve their daily physical functioning.

โ–ช๏ธ Unfortunately, the review found that interventional procedures probably result in little to no difference in physical functioning for both axial and radicular pain.

๐—”๐—ฑ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—˜๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐˜€

โ–ช๏ธ Furthermore, these procedures are not without physical risks.

โ–ช๏ธ Low certainty evidence indicates that some interventionsโ€”such as joint radiofrequency nerve ablation, joint-targeted injections of local anaesthetics and steroids, and intramuscular injectionsโ€”may actually increase the risk of non-serious adverse events when compared to sham procedures.

๐—ช๐—ต๐˜† ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐— ๐—ฎ๐˜๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€ ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ฃ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐—–๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ

โ–ช๏ธ Currently, medical guidelines conflict: some organizations recommend against invasive treatments for low back disorders, while others strongly endorse all commonly performed interventional procedures.

โ–ช๏ธ The review detailed in the sources aims to settle this controversy by providing a highly rigorous baseline of evidence.

โ–ช๏ธ The findings heavily suggest that many patients are undergoing expensive, invasive, and potentially harmful treatments that offer no more clinical benefit than a placebo.

โœ… ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ง๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜„๐—ฎ๐˜†

โ–ช๏ธ According to the comprehensive data in the sources, no commonly performed interventional procedure offers convincing evidence of important pain relief or physical functioning improvement for chronic spine pain.

โ–ช๏ธ As the medical community and patients digest these findings, it underscores the critical importance of evidence-based medicine and may prompt a necessary shift away from repetitive, costly interventional procedures.

18/05/2026

I was talking to a patient about this exact thing. Piriformis as a primary diagnosis in my opinion is very rare. In his case it is secondary to an L5 nerve root irritation. He has minimal lower back pain. Mostlly he has buttock pain and posterior thigh pain with some big toe tingling.

https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=36240693018847732&set=a.396786736998481

Send a message to learn more

Address

144 James Cook Drive
Kings Langley, NSW
2147

Opening Hours

Monday 9am - 6pm
Tuesday 9am - 6pm
Wednesday 9am - 6pm
Thursday 3pm - 7pm
Friday 9am - 6pm

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Kings Langley Chiropractic Centre posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to Kings Langley Chiropractic Centre:

Shortcuts

Share

Category