11/07/2026
The fight to limit “screen time” cannot be won, Ian Bogost argued in 2025. To recognize that fact—and to understand how it happened—is a small, important step toward salvation.
https://theatln.tc/9QAo1Eph
“The fact is, you cannot participate fully in contemporary life without devoting a substantial amount of time to the screen,” Bogost writes. “In this context of screen omnipresence, to measure the amount of time you spend looking at a screen is simply to ask how much time you spend awake and cogent, for almost everything you do now requires a screen to do it.”
Tracking screen time won’t help you reduce it for two reasons. “First, because general-purpose computing made screens so widespread that many worthwhile activities take place on them,” Bogost writes. Whether by keeping close to loved ones through text or by reading articles online, “the raw quantity of time one spends in the thrall of screens says almost nothing about the value of the time spent.”
Second, measuring screen time for self-improvement fails because few, if any, activities even exist outside screen time, Bogost continues. “Nature has been conquered by cellular coverage. Bars and restaurants were already riddled with screens before everyone at the table also clutched one in their hand.” Many schools have replaced chalkboards with computer-controlled smartboards or distributed digital tablets to every student.
“Perhaps someday the age of screens will end, at the hand of some unthinkable novelty or civilization-ending calamity,” Bogost continues. “But until that happens, tracking use of screens—let alone trying to curtail it—will have little meaning. For now, at least, you are doomed to live at screen time.”
🎨: Bettmann / Getty