10/09/2026
๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ณ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐บ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ถ๐ ๐ป๐ผ๐ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ป๐ฑ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐๐ต๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ถ๐ ๐ณ๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ.
It is not turning things that didnโt work out as you wanted or where challenging into something positive before you have had time to understand it.
And itโs not about ignore facts, concerns or consequences.
Reframing means keeping the facts while becoming curious about the conclusion you have drawn or perspective from which you approach them
For example:
You tried to set a boundary.
Your voice shook.
You did not explain yourself as clearly as you wanted.
Outcome: The other person dint fully gets it and might have been irritated.
Those may be the facts.
The conclusion you might form:
โI handled that terribly.โ
โI am not capable of standing up for myself.โ
โNothing I have been working on is making any difference.โ
Those conclusions can feel true because they are connected to not achieving what you intended.
But these are not the only possible interpretation.
A more balanced reframe might be:
โThat conversation was difficult.โ
โThere are parts of my delivery that I need to work on.โ
โI still expressed something I would previously have kept to myself.โ
โThis is wasnโt easy and didnโt work out, but that does not mean nothing is changing.โ
You are not pretending the conversation went perfectly.
You are considering the full picture rather than allowing one aspect to define the whole experience.
I usually ask myself the following to help myself to get the full picture:
1. What actually happened?
2. What conclusion am I drawing from it?
3. Is that the only reasonable conclusion?
4. How else can I phrase this so it acknowledges both steps taken, effort, what changed and what didnโt go well or didnโt work out?
A more balanced conclusion may reduce possible shame, frustration or discouragement.
This means you can review what happened more clearly and decide what you want to do next.
Reframing does not change the facts.
It can change the meaning you might automatically attach to them.
Do you have a habit of forming automatically generalised conclusion that might be worth reviewing?