23/08/2026
A new study on people with hyperventilation syndrome suggests something quite different from what is often taught in functional breathing pop science.
The reality is that the evidence behind some of the strongest claims in this space is surprisingly limited.
That is one of the differences between science and marketing.
Science builds understanding slowly. It deals in uncertainty, competing explanations and accumulating evidence.
Pop science tends to turn that uncertainty into something concrete, simple and marketable.
This paper is a good example. Hyperventilation syndrome appears to involve multiple layers of breathing physiology, perception and behaviour. Reducing it to “poor CO₂ tolerance” may be attractive because it gives people a simple problem and, conveniently, a method to sell as the solution.
The nuance isn’t as s*xy. It probably won’t scale as quickly either.
But learning the nuance changes how you think, assess and work with people.
That is how we raise the standard of this industry.
If you want to work at that level, I’m with you.