07/28/2026
Wow! - Who are the fools at City Hall that would rather use our money to hire 3 outside Law firms to fight what appears to be a losing battle, rather than negotiate a mutually amical end to this soap opera?
City Hall keeps losing their cases at decision time - I believe it is
5 - 0 in Ms. Frey's favor - and it appears to me they are going to lose this one too.
BUT - the City doesn't seem to care because it's not their personal money.
I am personally very tired of how City Hall handles our tax money. It seems that every Council meeting (that we get to see) is a cash distribution with no questions asked. The money spent narrowing roads and making them barely passable. The outside "experts" brought in because our hired people are apparently "not qualified or capable" to do the project. And now the ongoing saga of expensive lawyers providing advice (on our dollar) that have not led to meaningful negotiations that would provide a resolution to the issues of Ms. Frey.
I am sick of it.
Read this.
__________________________________________________________________
this from a post on the page of " Medicine Hat Citizens for a Better Medicine Hat"
"Crucially, former Councillor Shila Sharps has publicly confirmed that she will testify voluntarily, without requiring a subpoena. Ms. Sharps is prepared to testify directly to the following material facts:
Fabricated OHS Hazards:
That senior administration explicitly represented to her that formal Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) hazard assessments had been performed to legally justify my communication restrictions, only to later admit that no such assessments had ever been conducted, a fact independently corroborated by my statutory information access requests.
Direct Instructions to Discriminate:
That she was directly instructed by terminated City Manager Ann Mitchell to stay out of the matter and explicitly refuse to provide me with disability accommodations.
Proof of Feasibility: That she actively defied those instructions, proactively implemented functional communication adjustments, and found them simple, effective, and operationally seamless to execute.
I note for the record that this accommodation was immediately stripped away when Councillor Sharps left office, and the City has stubbornly refused to reinstate it in any capacity." I also note that administration actively prevented Councillor Sharps from meeting with me in August of 2025, which would have likely resulting in a resolution of all of this with minimal financial impact to the City. If Administration is still advising you not to engage with me, who are they protecting? The liability of the City and Council has only increased as has the risk exposure. I am offering you an off ramp and as I told Mayor Clark Councillor's Young and Clugston, and City Manager Hutter on January 22, 2026, my goal is to have what's broken fixed so that what has happened to me can never happen to anyone again. Do you want it to happen to someone else?