10/15/2026
I usually stay as far away from this topic as possible... cause if there is one that has a clear divide , it's this one.
I want to start off by saying nuance is important, and so is context.
I get why 2 year olds are ridden.
Futurities, trainer's won't take anything older, there's a delusion that it is inherently harder to start something older, we want to get on their back before they are " too strong" 🙄
But I have watched far too many hours of dissections to sit here and tell you that early riding doesn't have consequences. Specifically to the pelvis, lower neck regions, and thoracic spine.
But this where nuance and context is still important.
What is the additional background information, and what are the specifics within a statement like " riding 2 year olds."
What environment did those 2 year olds come from? A perfectly groomed pen, or roaming 160 acres with playmates?
Have things like hoof angles, bodywork and dental been looked after before entering training?
What IS the program they are being put in? 90 days of circles, or a light backing broken up by in hand work?
WHO is riding them? A 250lb man or a 140lb female?
What has been done to prepare them for training? Are we pulling them from their small pen and sending them into a program? Or have we done in hand work to prepare our horses thoracic sling, wake up their stabilizers, start to activate those muscles that are so important for functional development.
Is the program year round or are we getting on their back the last 30 days of that 90 day program , then are we kicking them out to mature?
Is this a racehorse, a reiner, barrel horse, destined to be a jumper? Those are very different programs.
We cannot deny that what we subject our young horses to as 2,3 even 4 year olds... can impact them later in life. There is undeniable evidence of this. I see it everyday.
But the how, matters.