Cycle Breakers Counselling Inc.

06/07/2026

When a child’s safety becomes a "litigation tactic" in the eyes of the law, the system is fundamentally broken. 💔

What you just heard isn't a worst-case scenario script—it is a terrifying reality documented right inside the official parliamentary submissions for Bill C-223 (the Keeping Children Safe Act).

Right now in Canada, we are facing an upside-down reality in family courts. When a child courageously expresses genuine fear of an abusive parent, instead of triggering an immediate, trauma-informed investigation, it often triggers something entirely different: a defensive legal strategy. The protective parent is accused of "coaching" or "alienating" the child.

The court’s solution? To abruptly sever the bond with the safe, primary caregiver and hand the child over to the exact person they are terrified of, all under the guise of fixing "parental conflict".

This is institutional gaslighting at its worst, and it is exactly why Bill C-223 is so urgently needed.

This legislation aims to stop the dangerous practice of penalizing protective parents for simply doing their job: keeping their children safe. It forces the system to look at patterns of coercive control and prioritize actual, evidence-based safety over outdated legal myths.

To every parent currently trapped in this living nightmare:

If you are sitting in a courtroom feeling completely invisible, terrified that your protective instincts are being weaponized against you—please hear me: I see you, and you are not alone.

I am trying to build a community in this space where alienated and targeted parents can help one another, look through it for resources, and talk to other people who have walked through this exact fire. We cannot change a broken system in isolation.
🔗 Let’s find a path forward together. I have created a library of free resources linked directly in my bio to help you protect your peace, understand your rights, and navigate these complex family law dynamics.
We need to keep shining a light on this dark corner of our legal system. Have you or someone you know experienced this upside-down reality in court? Let’s talk about it in the comments below. 👇

06/06/2026

06/06/2026

On Thursday, June 11, 2026, from 1:00 – 3:00 p.m. ET, the Learning Network and Knowledge Hub present a Webinar that will look at the history of the groundbreaking case Ahluwalia v. Ahluwalia and consider what the majority decision of the Supreme Court of Canada means for survivors of intimate partner violence (IPV) in Canada.

Join panel speakers Kuldeep Ahluwalia, Kirsten Mercer, Maneesha Mehra, and Emily Murray. Click on the link below for more information and to register.

🔗https://ow.ly/Vytb50Z8fUF

06/05/2026

One of the most dangerous myths embedded in the family law system is the assumption that domestic violence completely stops the moment a couple separates. 🛑

As family court advocates consistently point out, separation is often the most volatile and dangerous window for a survivor.

Yet, the current system frequently treats post-separation abuse, financial starvation, and ongoing coercive control as mere "high-conflict bickering" between exes rather than a continuous pattern of violence.

🏛️ Dismantling the Separation Myth Under Bill C-223
The proposed changes in Bill C-223 (The Keeping Children Safe Act) take a direct, legislative aim at this judicial blind spot:
An End to Faulty Inferences: The bill explicitly states that courts must stop making the harmful assumption that family violence automatically ceases once spouses separate or legal proceedings begin.

Focusing on the Pattern: It forces the legal system to evaluate the continuous, lived reality of the child and the protective parent, recognizing that post-separation abuse is an extension of the exact same coercive control that existed during the relationship.

Evidence Over Outdated Assumptions: Judges would be legally restricted from using outdated stereotypes about how victims "should" act post-separation to dismiss valid protective concerns.

🤍 You Don't Have to Walk This Alone
If you are a parent stuck in the thick of post-separation legal battles right now, please hear me: your exhaustion is valid, and you are not alone.

We are actively building a dedicated community right here in this space where protective parents can find support, share hard-earned resources, and connect with others who truly understand this specific type of legal betrayal.

Let's keep sharing information, supporting each other, and breaking the cycle.

Let's look at the facts in the comments. 👇 What has your experience been with how courts view behavior after separation?

06/05/2026

FAMILY COURT NEEDS TO CHANGE

Right now, the family court system expects lawyers to look out for violence—but there is a massive gap.

There is no standardized, mandatory training or universal screening protocol. It is completely left up to individual lawyers to decide how (or if) they properly assess for coercive control.

Bill C-223 (The Keeping Children Safe Act) —
If passed, it legally mandates a strict, standardized professional screening obligation for family law practitioners on day ONE.

More importantly: if risk is identified, lawyers will have a strict legal duty to immediately implement a safety plan and connect that family to professional support.

This shifts the entire process from an adversarial battleground into a system that prioritizes immediate, trained threat assessment before a tragedy occurs.

To every protective parent in the thick of it right now:

You are not crazy, and you are not alone. I am actively building a safe community in this space where alienated and targeted parents can support one another, share resources, and talk to people who have actually walked through this fire.

06/05/2026

Let’s talk about the absolute illusion of "systemic reform." 🛑
Whenever a new specialized framework like Toronto’s Integrated Domestic Violence Court (IDVC) is announced, the public sighs a collective sigh of relief. The narrative is always: "Look! The system is finally evolving to protect victims of partner abuse by bringing family and criminal matters under one judge."
But look closely at the fine print.
This "integrated" system is explicitly barred from hearing cases that involve:
❌ Divorce
❌ Property Division
❌ Child Protection
How can a specialized domestic violence court provide a comprehensive, protective umbrella for families when it cannot even touch the fundamental legal mechanics of a family splitting up?
Divorce and property division are not just administrative details—in cases involving coercive control and post-separation abuse, they are the primary arenas where abusers execute financial strangulation, malicious litigation, and systemic exhaustion. By completely excluding these pieces, the system forces protective parents right back into fractured, uncoordinated courtrooms where the left hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing.
We don't need shiny new band-aids that look good on paper but leave the structural loopholes wide open. We need deep, foundational updates to family law that recognize how psychological violence permeates every single legal thread of a separation.
(Please note: This post is shared from an advocate perspective for educational purposes and is not clinical advice, therapy, or legal advice).
I am trying to build a community in this space where protective and alienated parents can support one another, share lived resources, and talk to others who understand this institutional exhaustion. I have also put together structured workbooks and educational tools on my link tree to help you navigate these broken frameworks and hold onto your reality. Take it one day at a time, and protect your peace.

06/04/2026

THE ALGORITHMS TRIED TO BLOCK THIS CONTENT.

I have had to re-record and re-edit this video five times just to get it to upload to social media. If this reached your feed, please engage, share, and save it to help push the data past the filters.

This is not a "men versus women" debate. This is about empirical data.

These are the documented findings from forensic researchers who went into incarcerated settings to interview individuals convicted of severe domestic harm.

To protect families, we have to look directly at the actual transcripts and the psychology of the perpetrators themselves.
If you are dealing with restrictive control or planning a separation, please know that you do not have to navigate this alone. Free, confidential support and safety planning are available twenty-four seven.

Canada:
ShelterSafe: Find a safe transition space near you across Canada at sheltersafe.ca
Assaulted Women’s Helpline: 1-866-863-0511 or Text ( #7233)
Alberta Family Violence Info Line: Call or Text 310-1818
United States:
National Domestic Violence Hotline: Call 1-800-799-SAFE (7233) or Text "START" to 88788 (thehotline.org)
United Kingdom:
National Domestic Abuse Helpline (Refuge): Call 0808 2000 247 (nationaldahelpline.org.uk)
Australia:
1800RESPECT: Call 1800 737 732 or text 0458 737 732 (1800respect.org.au)
International:
Find a vetted helpline in your specific country at www.findahelpline.com
Safety Tip: If you are worried your digital history is being monitored, please use a safe device at a public library or a trusted friend's house, or clear your browser history immediately after viewing.

06/04/2026

“Why don’t they just share custody?”

Because when dealing with a coercive controller, custody demands are rarely about parenting. They are a continuation of abuse.
An unsafe access demand happens when an ex uses legal maneuvers to insist on visitation terms that completely disregard physical or psychological safety.
It looks like:
👉 Demanding unsupervised overnights despite a documented history of harm.
👉 Launching aggressive 50/50 legal battles to avoid child support and drain your financial resources.
👉 Weaponizing drop-offs and handovers just to instigate conflict and harass you.

The family court system’s general bias toward “shared parenting” often rewards this tactic, leaving protective parents looking “uncooperative” simply for trying to enforce basic safety boundaries.

If you are in the thick of this right now, I see you. It is terrifying and draining, but you don’t have to carry it in isolation. We have a powerful community right here of parents helping parents.

Tools and strategies matter. I’ve put together a bunch of free resources on my Linktree to help you safely document coercive control and stand your ground. 🤍

06/04/2026

“The current system treats equal parenting time as a default mathematical formula, even where there has been unequal safety.” 💔

Those are not my words. Those are the exact, raw words submitted by a protective parent to the parliamentary committee studying Bill C-223—the Keeping Children Safe Act.

Right now in Canada, the general public assumes that leaving an abusive household means finding safety.

But as so many parents documented in their official submissions, separation doesn't end the violence; it often just moves it into the courtroom. When the legal system relies on cookie-cutter parenting schedules and forces a "cooperative co-parenting" narrative onto a history of coercive control, the system itself can be weaponized as a tool for ongoing manipulation.

This is exactly why we need Bill C-223.
It forces family courts to stop relying on dangerous mathematical defaults and start prioritizing evidence-based risk assessments before deciding what arrangement is actually safe for a child.

To every parent in the thick of it right now:
If you are navigating a family law system that feels like it’s completely minimizing your reality—please hear me: you are not crazy, and you are not alone.

I am working hard to build a community in this space where protective parents can support one another, share real strategies, and talk to people who truly understand this fire.
🔗 You don't have to walk this alone. I have put together a library of free resources specifically designed to help you protect your peace and navigate this broken system. Click the link tree in my bio to access them right now.
Let’s keep talking about this. What has your experience been with the family court system's defaults? Let me know in the comments below. 👇