28/08/2026
Mechanical ventilation during CPR: Does the mode matter? 🫁
Together with an international and multiprofessional team, PhD student Johannes Wittig from the Research Center for Emergency Medicine conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies comparing volume-controlled mechanical ventilation with manual ventilation or other mechanical ventilation modes for adults or children with cardiac arrest.
📚 They identified 13 studies (6 RCTs and 7 non-randomized studies) including 5,068 patients.
👶 No studies in children were found.
⚙️ Volume-controlled ventilation was compared to manual ventilation in four RCTs while pressure-controlled and the CPR-specific ventilation mode Chest Compression Synchronized Ventilation (CCSV) were investigated in one RCT each.
👉 Very low to low certainty evidence from randomized trials suggests no significant difference in clinical outcomes between volume-controlled mechanical ventilation and manual ventilation.
❓ High-quality evidence on the effectiveness of volume-controlled mechanical ventilation is still lacking. However, some randomized and non-randomized studies suggest that volume-controlled mechanical ventilation during CPR is feasible and various mechanical ventilation modes are already being used in clinical CPR outside of controlled research settings.
This review highlights a broad knowledge gap in resuscitation science – More high-quality research on the safety and effectives of mechanical ventilation modes during CPR is needed.
Johannes conducted the systematic review together with Anna Sommer Harrits, Emma Bürgstein, Robert M. Sutton, Kristian Krogh, Bo Løfgren, Simon Orlob and Kasper Glerup Lauridsen.
📖 The paper is freely available online in Resuscitation. Read the article here: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300957226002467?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Johannes Wittig is supported by the Aarhus University Research Foundation.