24/08/2026
My son’s EHCP assessment was refused because there was “not enough evidence.”
Why wasn’t there enough evidence?
Because his secondary school hasn’t known him long enough yet.
But his needs didn’t suddenly begin when he walked through the high-school gates.
The signs were there throughout primary school. The struggles were visible. The support was needed then—but too much was brushed under the carpet, managed informally or passed forward for the next school to deal with.
Now he is in Year 9, still without an EHCP and still waiting for the right support.
This is the impossible position families are placed in:
Primary schools say, “Let’s wait and see.”
Secondary schools say, “We haven’t known him long enough.”
Local authorities say, “There isn’t enough evidence.”
And the child carries the consequences.
A lack of recorded evidence does not mean a lack of need. It can mean that the system failed to recognise, document and respond to that need early enough.
We must stop allowing children to leave primary school with their difficulties hidden behind temporary adjustments, reduced expectations or coping strategies.
Record the concerns.
Listen to parents.
Gather the evidence.
Put support in place before transition—not after the child reaches crisis.
Children should not have to fail publicly before the system believes they need help.
This is exactly why we are building NeuroPathway: to capture everyday observations, connect evidence across home, school and professionals, and identify patterns before a child disappears through the gaps.
My son deserved earlier support.
So do thousands of other children.
Stop brushing unmet need under the carpet. The child eventually trips over everything hidden beneath it.