16/05/2026
When I sat down to write a blog about attachment theory I tried something I had not done before. I posed myself the questions an exam might ask: What is an attachment style, exactly?
And then I paused with it for longer than felt comfortable. I am a registered psychologist, trained in developmental psychology. I have read the foundational literature and sat real-life exams. And yet, when I tried to pin the term down, it scattered.
That experience of being stopped by a familiar word is itself the clinical phenomenon I wanted to write about. It is what happens, in a session, when a patient is gently asked to slow down a label they have been using as a declarative statement rather than as an opening.
What I realised, by trying to define attachment for myself, is that pop psychology attachment language can be overly simplistic. The categories are not necessarily wrong. Instead, they are partial. For me, how we relate to others is nuanced and dynamic. And it cannot be captured neatly by four labels simple labels.