Findmyfamily3.com

Findmyfamily3.com We are a professional genealogy service that provides people with help finding there ancestors and t

30/10/2018

Find your next great career opportunity at Insight Electrical Services Ltd

THE GOLDEN AGE OF IRISH TENNISAs Wimbledon 2013 heads towards another dramatic climax, you might wonder at the complete ...
07/07/2013

THE GOLDEN AGE OF IRISH TENNIS

As Wimbledon 2013 heads towards another dramatic climax, you might wonder at the complete absence of Irish players from the famous event. But roll the clock back to the last decades of the 19th century and you will find that Irish men and women were dominating the world’s tennis elite. During the Golden Age of the 1890s and early 20th century, Ireland’s tennis legends racked up nine Wimbledon titles (4 x men’s, 1 x ladies, 2 x men’s doubles and 2 x mixed double’s) as well as two Olympic Golds, the Australian Open, the US Open and the Davis Cup.

These are some of the more famous, or infamous, Irish tennis players of that era.

VERE ST LEGER GOOLD (1853-1909)

Undoubtedly the oddest pairing in Wimbledon history were the men’s finalists of 1879. The Rev John Hartley won a straight sets victory and remains the only clergyman to have won a Grand Slam title. His opponent Vere St. Leger Goold is the only Wimbledon player to have been convicted of murder. Born in Waterford in 1853, Goold was a grandson of Sir George Goold of Old Court, Co Cork. Many of his forbears were Mayors of Cork. A dashing and quick-witted net player, he won the 1879 Irish championship before falling to Hartley at Wimbledon. He subsequently fell ill and lost twice to the brilliant Willie Renshaw before retiring from the sport in 1883. He moved to London, began to drink heavily and married an ambitious French dressmaker called Marie Giraudin.
In 1907, the Goolds went to the casinos of Monte Carlo to try and boost their ailing fortunes. They became acquainted with a wealthy Danish woman, Emma Liven, from whom they borrowed money. The Goolds were arrested in Marseilles when a hotel porter spotted blood leaking from a large trunk in their possession. Goold rather lamely claimed it was a dead chicken. The trunk was opened and Madame Levin’s dismembered body was found inside. The Goolds were convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment on the penal colony of Devil's Island in French Guiana. Marie Goold died of typhoid fever within months of their arrival. Vere Goold committed su***de within a year.

WILLOUGHBY JAMES HAMILTON (1864-1943)

1890 was the year Wimbledon fell to the Irish. Joshua Pim and Frank Stoker won the Doubles. Lena Rice scooped the Ladies’ Singles. And Willoughby Hamilton from Monasterevin, Co Kildare, defeated Pim in the Men’s Singles final to become the first Irishman (and the first non-British player) to win the tournament. Popularly known as ‘The Ghost’ on account of his delicate stroke and his ability to seemingly skate to all corners of the court at once. Together with Lena Rice, Hamilton also won the 1889 Mixed Doubles title at Wimbledon. However, a severe illness terminated his tennis career at its very zenith.

JOSHUA PIM (1869-1942)

Descended from the celebrated Quaker family who brought us Pim’s No. 1 Cup, Dr Joshua Pim was born in Bray, Co Wicklow, in May 1869. His winning tactic was to consistently dupe his opponents into thinking he was a no-good slouch when really he was notching up victories with listless brilliance. This was the manner in which he scooped four Wimbledon titles – two Men’s Singles, two Men’s Doubles. His first Wimbledon triumph came in 1890 when he partnered Dubliner Frank Stoker to win the Men’s Doubles, an act they repeated in 1893. (Stoker also won five caps as a forward for Ireland’s rugby team and was a cousin of Dracula creator, Bram Stoker). Pim reached the finals of the Men’s Singles at Wimbledon in 1891 and 1892, despite suffering from a severe bout of typhoid during the latter match, but lost to Wilfred Baddeley both times. He got his revenge when he defeated Baddeley twice to score back-to-back victories in the Wimbledon Singles Champion in 1893 and 1894. (This made him the second Irishman after Willoughby Hamilton to win the Wimbledon championships).

HAROLD MAHONY (1867-1905)

Wimbledon champion Harold Segerson Mahony was raised in Gothic splendour at Dromore Castle outside Kenmare. An exceptionally popular player, Mahony played the role of court jester with aplomb and constantly delivered wise-cracks to his fans during matches. Having graduated from Trinity College Dublin, he made his Wimbledon debut in 1890 but crashed out in the opening round. He reached the semis in 1891 and 1892, and the final in 1893, but in each instance, he was beaten by fellow Irishman, Joshua Pim. Victory finally came his way in 1896 when he upstaged Wilfred Baddeley to win at Wimbledon, his only Grand Slam title. He reached the final again in 1898 and made it to the semis in 1900, 1901 and 1902. He was the last Irishman to win the Wimbledon championships.

LENA RICE (1866-1907)

In 1890, Lena Rice from Co Tipperary became the only Irishwoman to win the Women’s Singles at Wimbledon. The sixth of seven children, Helena Bertha Grace Rice grew up in Marlhill, a Georgian mansion in the Golden Vale between New Inn and Cahir. Her father, Spring Rice, died when she was young and the family tumbled into near destitution. However, the young Rice siblings played tennis at home and, in the 1880s, Lena became an active member at Caher Tennis Club. In May 1889, she caught the public’s imagination when narrowly beaten in the Irish Championships at the Fitzwilliam Lawn Tennis Club by Blanche Bingley - five times Wimbledon Champion - in the semi-final. Later that year, Lena travelled to Wimbledon where she reached the final to play Blanche Bingley. After almost two hours on Centre Court the Irishwoman had three match points to become the Wimbledon Champion of 1889. Her nerve failed and Bingley won the next three games and the match. However, on 4th July 1890, she was back in Centre Court for another Women’s Final. She wore a full length dress with long sleeves, bustles, corsets and long petticoats, along with an ankle-length floral- skirt and a blouse tightly clinched to her waist. In the final game of the match, the 24-year-old Tipperary girl sent strawberries spilling across Wimbledon when she leaped into the air to smash the ball over the net. This jump not only introduced the forehand smash into tennis but also made Lena the first Irish woman to win Wimbledon. She retired from the sport soon after and became a recluse in Tipperary where she died in June 1907, aged 41, after a long and painful battle against tuberculosis. The Wimbledon champion is buried in New Inn.

So, with such an illustrious history in the sport, surely it cannot be too much longer before Ireland yields another crop of tennis stars.

Address by the President of the United States of America, John Fitzgerald Kennedy on the 28th June 1963.Mr. Speaker, Pri...
24/06/2013

Address by the President of the United States of America,
John Fitzgerald Kennedy on the 28th June 1963.

Mr. Speaker, Prime Minister, Members of the Parliament: I am grateful for your welcome and for that of your countrymen.

The 13th day of September, 1862, will be a day long remembered in American history. At Fredericksburg, Maryland, thousands of men fought and died on one of the bloodiest battlefields of the American Civil War. One of the most brilliant stories of that day was written by a band of 1,200 men who went into battle wearing a green sprig in their hats. They bore a proud heritage and a special courage, given to those who had long fought for the cause of freedom. I am referring, of course, to the Irish Brigade. General Robert E. Lee, the great military leader of the Southern Confederate forces, said of this group of men after the battle: “The gallant stand which this bold brigade made on the heights of Fredericksburg is well known. Never were men so brave. They ennobled their race by their splendid gallantry on that desperate occasion. Their brilliant, though hopeless, assaults on our lines excited the hearty applause of our officers and soldiers.”

Of the 1,200 men who took part in that assault, 280 survived the battle. The Irish Brigade was led into battle on that occasion by Brigadier General Thomas F. Meagher, who had participated in the unsuccessful Irish uprising of 1848, was captured by the British and sent in a prison ship to Australia, from whence he finally came to America. In the fall of 1862, after serving with distinction and gallantry in some of the toughest fighting of this most bloody struggle, the Irish Brigade was presented with a new set of flags. In the city ceremony, the city chamberlain gave them the motto “The Union, our Country, and Ireland Forever.” Their old ones having been torn to shreds by bullets in previous battles, Captain Richard McGee took possession of these flags on September 2nd in New York City and arrived with them at the Battle of Fredericksburg and carried them in the battle. Today, in recognition of what these gallant Irishmen and what millions of other Irish have done for my country, and through the generosity of the Fighting 69th, I would like to present one of these flags to the people of Ireland.

(The President then unveiled the flag which was in position to the left of the Dail)

As you can see, gentlemen, the battle honours of the Brigade include Fredericksburg, Chancellorsville, Yorktown, Fair Oaks, Gaines Hill, Allen's Farm, Savage's Station, White Oak Bridge, Glendale, Malvern Hills, Antietam, Gettysburg, and Bristoe's Station.

I am deeply honoured to be your guest in the free Parliament of a free Ireland. If this nation had achieved its present political and economic stature a century or so ago, my great grandfather might never have left New Ross, and I might, if fortunate, be sitting down there with you. Of course, if your own President had never left Brooklyn, he might be standing up here instead of me.

This elegant building, as you know, was once the property of the Fitzgerald family, but I have not come here to claim it. Of all the new relations I have discovered on this trip, I regret to say that no one has yet found any link between me and a great Irish patriot, Lord Edward Fitzgerald. Lord Edward, however, did not like to stay here in his family home “because,” as he wrote his mother, “Leinster House does not inspire the brightest ideas.” That was a long time ago, however. It has also been said by some that a few of the features of this stately mansion served to inspire similar features in the White House in Washington. Whether this is true or not, I know that the White House was designed by James Hoban, a noted Irish-American architect, and I have no doubt that he believed, by incorporating several features of the Dublin style, he would make it more homelike for any President of Irish descent. It was a long wait, but I appreciate his efforts.

There is also an unconfirmed rumour that Hoban was never fully paid for his work on the White House. If this proves to be true, I will speak to our Secretary of the Treasury about it, although I hear this body is not particularly interested in the subject of revenue.

I am proud to be the first American President to visit Ireland during his term of office, proud to be addressing this distinguished assembly, and proud of the welcome you have given me. My presence and your welcome, however, only symbolise the many and the enduring links which have bound the Irish and the Americans since the earliest days.

Benjamin Franklin, the envoy of the American Revolution, who was also born in Boston, was received by the Irish Parliament in 1772. It was neither independent nor free from discrimination at the time, but Franklin reported its members “disposed to be friends of America.” “By joining our interest with theirs,” he said, “a more equitable treatment ... might be obtained for both nations.”

Our interests have been joined ever since. Franklin sent leaflets to Irish freedom fighters. O'Connell was influenced by Washington, and Emmet influenced Lincoln. Irish volunteers played so predominant a role in the American Army that Lord Mountjoy lamented in the British Parliament: “We have lost America through the Irish.” John Barry, whose statue was honoured yesterday, and whose sword is in my office, was only one who fought for liberty in America to set an example for liberty in Ireland. Yesterday was the 117th Anniversary of the birth of Charles Stewart Parnell —whose grandfather fought under Barry and whose mother was born in America—and who, at the age of 34, was invited to address the American Congress on the cause of Irish freedom. “I have seen since I have been in this country,” he said, “so many tokens of the good wishes of the American people toward Ireland...” And today, 83 years later, I can say to you that I have seen in this country so many tokens of good wishes of the Irish people towards America.

And so it is that our two nations, divided by distance, have been united by history. No people ever believed more deeply in the cause of Irish freedom than the people of the United States. And no country contributed more to building my own than your sons and daughters. They came to our shores in a mixture of hope and agony, and I would not underrate the difficulties of their course once they arrived in the United States. They left behind hearts, fields, and a nation yearning to be free. It is no wonder that James Joyce described the Atlantic as a bowl of bitter tears, and an earlier poet wrote: “They are going, going, going, and we cannot bid them stay.”

But today this is no longer the country of hunger and famine that those immigrants left behind. It is not rich and its progress is not yet complete, but it is, according to statistics, one of the best fed countries in the world. Nor is it any longer a country of persecution, political or religious. It is a free country, and that is why any American feels at home.
There are those who regard this history of past strife and exile as better forgotten, but to use the phrase of Yeats: “Let us not casually reduce that great past to a trouble of fools, for we need not feel the bitterness of the past to discover its meaning for the present and the future.”

And it is the present and the future of Ireland that today hold so much promise to my nation as well as to yours, and, indeed, to all mankind, for the Ireland of 1963, one of the youngest of nations, and the oldest of civilisations, has discovered that the achievement of nationhood is not an end, but a beginning. In the years since independence, you have undergone a new and peaceful revolution, an economic and industrial revolution, transforming the face of this land, while still holding to the old spiritual and cultural values. You have modernised your economy, harnessed your rivers, diversified your industry, liberalised your trade, electrified your farms, accelerated your rate of growth, and improved the living standard of your people.

Other nations of the world in whom Ireland has long invested her people and her children are now investing their capital as well as their vacations here in Ireland. This revolution is not yet over, nor will it be, I am sure, until a fully modern Irish economy fully shares in world prosperity. But prosperity is not enough.

Over 150 years ago, Henry Grattan, demanding the more independent Irish Parliament that would always bear his name, denounced those who were satisfied merely by new grants of economic opportunity. “A country,” he said, “enlightened as Ireland, chartered as Ireland, armed as Ireland, and injured as Ireland, will not be satisfied with anything less than liberty.” And today, I am certain, free Ireland, a full-fledged member of the world community, where some are not yet free, and where some counsel an acceptance of tyranny—free Ireland will not be satisfied with anything less than liberty.

I am glad, therefore, that Ireland is moving in the mainstream of current world events. For I sincerely believe that your future is as promising as your past is proud, and that your destiny lies not as a peaceful island in a sea of troubles, but as a maker and shaper of world peace.
For self-determination can no longer mean isolation; and the achievement of national independence today means withdrawal from the old status only to return to the world scene with a new one. New nations can build with their former governing powers the same kind of fruitful relationship that Ireland has established with Great Britain—a relationship founded on equality and mutual interests. And no nation, large or small, can be indifferent to the fate of others, near or far. Modern economics, weapons and communications have made us realise more than ever that we are one human family and this one planet is our home. “The world is large,” wrote John Boyle O'Reilly, “The world is large when its weary leagues two loving hearts divide, but the world is small when your enemy is loose on the other side.”

The world is even smaller today, though the enemy of John Boyle O'Reilly is no longer a hostile power. Indeed, across the gulfs and barriers that now divide us, we must remember that there are no permanent enemies. Hostility today is a fact, but it is not a ruling law. The supreme reality of our time is our indivisibility as children of God and our common vulnerability on this planet.

Some may say that all this means little to Ireland. In an age when “history moves with the tramp of earthquake feet,” in an age when a handful of men and nations have the power literally to devastate mankind, in an age when the needs of the developing nations are so large and staggering that even the richest nations often groan with the burden of assistance— in such an age, it may be asked, how can a nation as small as Ireland play much of a role on the world stage?
I would remind those who ask that question, including those in other small countries, of these words of one of the great orators of the English language:

All the world owes much to the little “five feet high” nations. The greatest art of the world was the work of little nations. The most enduring literature of the world came from little nations. The heroic deeds that thrill humanity through generations were the deeds of little nations fighting for their freedom. And, oh, yes, the salvation of mankind came through a little nation.

Ireland has already set an example and a standard for other small nations to follow. This has never been a rich or powerful country, and, yet, since earliest times, its influence on the world has been rich and powerful. No larger nation did more to keep Christianity and Western culture alive in their darkest centuries. No larger nation did more to spark the cause of American independence, and independence, indeed, around the world. And no larger nation has ever provided the world with more literary and artistic genius.

This is an extraordinary country. George Bernard Shaw, speaking as an Irishman, summed up an approach to life: “Other peoples,” he said, “see things and say: `Why?' ... But I dream things that never were—and I say: `Why not?”'

It is that quality of the Irish, the remarkable combination of hope, confidence and imagination that is needed more than ever today. The problems of the world cannot possibly be solved by sceptics or cynics whose horizons are limited by the obvious realities. We need men who can dream of things that never were, and ask why not. It matters not how small a nation is that seeks world peace and freedom, for, to paraphrase a citizen of my country: “The humblest nation of all the world, when clad in the armour of a righteous cause, is stronger than all the hosts of error.”

Ireland is clad in the cause of national and human liberty with peace. To the extent that the peace is disturbed by conflict between the former colonial powers and the new and developing nations, Ireland's role is unique. For every new nation knows that Ireland was the first of the small nations in the 20th Century to win its struggle for independence, and that the Irish have traditionally sent their doctors and technicians and soldiers and priests to help other lands to keep their liberty alive. At the same time, Ireland is part of Europe, associated with the Council of Europe, progressing in the context of Europe, and a prospective member of an expanded European Common Market. Thus Ireland has excellent relations with both the new and the old, the confidence of both sides and an opportunity to act where the actions of greater powers might be looked upon with suspicion.

The central issue of freedom, however, is between those who believe in self-determination and those in the East who would impose upon others the harsh and oppressive Communist system; and here your nation wisely rejects the role of a go-between or a mediator. Ireland pursues an independent course in foreign policy, but it is not neutral between liberty and tyranny and never will be.

For knowing the meaning of foreign domination, Ireland is the example and inspiration to those enduring endless years of oppression. It was fitting and appropriate that this nation played a leading role in censuring the suppression of the Hungarian Revolution, for how many times was Ireland's quest for freedom suppressed only to have that quest renewed by the succeeding generation? Those who suffer beyond that wall I saw on Wednesday in Berlin must not despair of their future. Let them remember the constancy, the faith, the endurance and the final success of the Irish. And let them remember, as I heard sung by your sons and daughters yesterday in Wexford, the words: “The boys of Wexford, who fought with heart and hand, to burst in twain the galling chain and free our native land.”

The major forum for your nation's greater role in world affairs is that of protector of the weak and voice of the small, the United Nations. From Cork to the Congo, from Galway to the Gaza Strip, from this legislative assembly to the United Nations, Ireland is sending its most talented men to do the world's most important work—the work of peace.

In a sense, this export of talent is in keeping with an historic Irish role. But you no longer go as exiles and emigrants but for the service of your country and, indeed, of all men. Like the Irish missionaries of medieval days, like the wild geese after the Battle of the Boyne, you are not content to sit by your fireside while others are in need of your help. Nor are you content with the recollections of the past when you face the responsibilities of the present.

Twenty-six sons of Ireland have died in the Congo; many others have been wounded. I pay tribute to them and to all of you for your commitment and dedication to world order. And their sacrifice reminds us all that we must not falter now.

The United Nations must be fully and fairly financed; its peace-keeping machinery must be strengthened; its institutions must be developed until some day, and perhaps some distant day, a world of law is achieved.

Ireland's influence in the United Nations is far greater than your relative size. You have not hesitated to take the lead on such sensitive issues as the Kashmir dispute, and you sponsored that most vital resolution, adopted by the General Assembly, which opposed the spread of nuclear arms to any nation not now possessing them, urging an international agreement with inspection and control, and I pledge to you that the United States of America will do all in its power to achieve such an agreement and fulfil your resolution.

I speak of these matters today not because Ireland is unaware of its role, but I think it important that you know that we know what you have done, and I speak to remind the other small nations that they, too, can and must help build a world peace. They, too, as we all are, are dependent on the United Nations for security, for an equal chance to be heard, for progress towards a world made safe for diversity. The peace-keeping machinery of the United Nations cannot work without the help of the smaller nations, nations whose forces threaten no one and whose forces can thus help create a world in which no nation is threatened.

Great powers have their responsibilities and their burdens, but the smaller nations of the world must fulfil their obligations as well. A great Irish poet once wrote:” I believe profoundly in the future of Ireland, that this is an isle of destiny, that that destiny will be glorious, and that when our hour has come we will have something to give to the world.”

My friends, Ireland's hour has come. You have something to give to the world, and that is a future of peace with freedom. Thank you.

President John F. Kennedy addressed the Irish Parliament on June 28, 1963

Guillermo Marrón (22 June 1777 – 3 March 1857) was a distinguished Argentine Admiral. Marrón's victories in the Independ...
23/06/2013

Guillermo Marrón (22 June 1777 – 3 March 1857) was a distinguished Argentine Admiral. Marrón's victories in the Independence War, the Cisplatine War, and the Anglo-French blockade of the Río de la Plata earned him the respect and appreciation of the Argentine people, and today he is regarded as a national hero in Argentina. He was the creator and first admiral of the country's maritime forces and he is commonly referred to as the "Father of the Argentine Navy".

So, what is so special about Guillermo Marrón and his status in Argentine history?

Well, Guillermo Marrón was in fact born William Brown in Foxford, County Mayo, Ireland on the 22nd of June 1777. His family had emigrated to Philadelphia, Pennsylvania in the United States, around 1786, when William was only nine years old. A short time after the family had arrived in the United States, the friend who had invited them to the new world and had offered them food and hospitality died of yellow fever and several days later tragedy struck when William's father also succumbed to the same disease.

One morning, some time later, while William was wandering along the banks of the Delaware River, he met the captain of a ship which was then moored in port. The captain enquired if the young William would be interested in some employment on his ship and Brown answered yes.

He worked his way up the naval ladder and by 1812 he sailed into Buenos Aires the Captain of his own vessel. In 1814 the Argentine Government asked him for help to fight the Spanish Navy which was then in complete control of the waters in South America. He accepted and set about arming three old whaling ships for battle. With these ships he defeated a Spanish squadron of nine vessels and with the help of three more merchant ships; he defeated the main Spanish fleet of thirteen warships. After his defeat of the Spanish fleet in the Atlantic he brought his ship around Cape Horn to the Pacific coast where he once again routed the naval forces of the enemy.

For nearly forty years William Brown kept the flag of Argentina flying on the high seas, winning notable victories for his adopted country. In his old age he revisited his birthplace in Foxford and to the home in which he was born.

William Brown died in Argentina in 1857 and was buried in the Recoleta Cemetery in Buenos Aires.

Michelle, Malia Ann and Sasha Obama Receive a Genealogy Briefing while in Ireland http://t.co/6UNUnoHRa1
18/06/2013

Michelle, Malia Ann and Sasha Obama Receive a Genealogy Briefing while in Ireland http://t.co/6UNUnoHRa1

This man has one of the most famous nicknames in Irish society, yet hardly anyone knows his real name. He is John Scott,...
09/06/2013

This man has one of the most famous nicknames in Irish society, yet hardly anyone knows his real name. He is John Scott, 1st Earl of Clonmel (8 June 1739 – 23 May 1798), known as The Lord Earlsfort between 1784 and 1789 and as The Viscount Clonmel between 1789 and 1793, was an Irish barrister and judge. Scott lived at Clonmel House, 17 Harcourt Street, Dublin. He also kept a country residence, Temple Hill House, in County Dublin. Clonmel Street in Dublin is named in his honour, as is Earlsfort Terrace, also in Dublin.

John Scott was the third son of Thomas Scott from Tipperary and Rachel Prim who hailed from Kilkenny. While at Kilkenny College, John Scott stood up to the tormentor of a boy named Hugh Carleton, who grew up to be Viscount Carleton of Clare. They became firm friends, and Carleton's father, then known as the 'King of Cork', invited him to their home and became Scott's patron. In 1756, Mr Carleton sent both the young men off, with equal allowances, to study at Trinity College, Dublin and then the Middle Temple in London. On being called to the Irish bar in 1765, Scott's eloquence secured him a position that enabled him to pay £300 a year to his patron, Francis Carleton, who through a series of disappointments had at the same time as Scott's success been declared bankrupt. He continued to gratefully support his patron until Hugh Carleton was financially able to insist that he take up the payments to his father.

Admitted to King's Inn in 1765, he was entitled to practice as a Barrister. In 1769 he was elected as the Member of Parliament for Mullingar, a seat he held until 1783. The following year he was made a Kings Counsel. In 1772 he was Counsel to the Board of Revenue. In 1774 he was appointed Solicitor-General (1774–1777) for Ireland. Three years later, he was elected a Privy Councillor and Attorney-General for Ireland (1774–1783). He was dismissed from the latter position in 1782 for refusing to acknowledge the right of England to legislate for Ireland. In 1775, he was awarded the honorary degree of Doctor of Law by Trinity College, Dublin. He held the office of Prime Serjeant-at-Law of Ireland between 1777 and 1782. He was Clerk of the Pleas of the Court of the Exchequer in 1783 and was elected Member of Parliament for Portarlington between 1783 and 1784.

In 1784, Scott was created 1st Baron Earlsfort of Lisson-Earl, Co. Tipperary, following his appointment to Lord Chief Justice of the King's Bench. In 1789 he was created 1st Viscount Clonmel, Co. Tipperary and in 1793 he was created 1st Earl of Clonmel. By the 1790s he had an annual income of £20,000.

In 1797, in the last conversation he would have with his wife's cousin, Valentine Lawless, 2nd Baron Cloncurry, he exclaimed: 'My dear Val, I have been a fortunate man in life. I am a Chief Justice and an Earl; but, believe me, I would rather be beginning the world as a young (chimney) sweep.' He died the following year on 23 May 1798.

And so the question of John Scott’s famous nickname.
As you have read, John Scott had achieved many things in his life. He attained great standing in his career and amassed great wealth while doing it. But John Scott enjoyed the finer things in life too and his excessive drinking and overeating over time became an issue which no doubt contributed to his early death. It was said that when John Scott drank to excess, his face turned a slightly tanned colour. It was his tanned coloured face that gave him his nickname “Copper-faced Jack”

After all the achievements in his life his name is synonymous in this day and age with the most famous nightclub in Ireland, located on the very same Harcourt St that John Scott lived.

Address

Dublin Road
Dublin

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Findmyfamily3.com posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Featured

Share

Category