17/08/2026
This is, in my view, one of the most valuable studies to come out of the IFEM Endo group.
Why? 10 YEARS of follow-up.
In endometriosis surgery, we often debate techniques based on short-term outcomes, retrospective series and individual surgical philosophy. This study is different: patients with significant re**al endometriosis were prospectively followed for an entire decade after surgery in an expert endometriosis centre.
And the message is important.
We need to move beyond surgical “camps.”
It is no longer reasonable to say “I shave everyone” or “I resect everyone.”
A bowel endometriosis surgeon should be capable of all three techniques:
🔹 Re**al shaving
🔹 Full-thickness disc excision
🔹 Segmental bowel resection
The technique should be determined by the lesion and the ability to achieve appropriate complete excision — not by the surgeon’s limited repertoire.
And wait until you see the fertility results.
85.3% of women who wanted pregnancy conceived after surgery. Those results deserve serious attention when counselling patients about surgery versus proceeding directly to assisted reproduction.
10-year data changes the conversation.
📄 Long term outcomes of surgical management of re**al endometriosis: 10-year follow-up of patients enrolled in a randomized trial
Proud to be a co-author of this work.
Bowel endometriosis is not one operation.
There are three important surgical tools:
🔹 Shaving — removing the lesion while preserving the bowel wall where complete excision can be achieved.
🔹 Disc excision — removing a full-thickness portion of the bowel wall containing the disease.
🔹 Segmental resection — removing a segment of bowel and reconnecting it.
The question should never simply be:
“Do you shave or resect?”
The better question is:
Which technique is appropriate for THIS lesion?
Good endometriosis surgery requires the ability to make that decision intraoperatively — and the technical ability to execute all three.
This is what makes this study so valuable.
55 women. Significant deep re**al endometriosis. Followed for 10 years.
Long-term surgical data like this are extremely difficult to obtain.
The study didn’t just ask whether