18/06/2026
๐๐ง๐๐ฌ ๐ก๐ ๐ ๐๐๐ข๐ฅ ๐ฅ๐๐ฉ๐๐ฆ๐๐ข๐ก๐ฆ ๐ก๐๐ฆ๐๐ ๐๐ข!
(๐ข๐ฅ ๐ช๐ข๐ฅ๐ฆ๐, ๐ฃ๐ฅ๐ข๐ง๐ข๐๐ข๐ ๐๐๐ฆ๐๐ฃ๐ฃ๐ฅ๐ข๐ฉ๐๐)
If you need help, Comment "CHECKLIST" so we can send to you our AI powered assessment tool for FREE.
Back to the topic, most protocols are not returned because the research question is bad.
More often, the Ethics Committee is asking:
"Can this study be conducted safely, ethically, and produce reliable results?"
Before resubmitting, take a closer look at these areas:
๐ญ. ๐๐ผ ๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ ๐ผ๐ฏ๐ท๐ฒ๐ฐ๐๐ถ๐๐ฒ๐, ๐บ๐ฒ๐๐ต๐ผ๐ฑ๐ผ๐น๐ผ๐ด๐, ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฎ๐น๐๐๐ถ๐ ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐ฐ๐ต?
One of the most common comments is when the objectives ask one thing, but the methodology or statistical plan answers another.
๐ฎ. ๐๐ ๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐ผ๐ฐ๐ผ๐น ๐ฎ๐น๐ถ๐ด๐ป๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐ถ๐๐ต ๐ฐ๐๐ฟ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐ฃ๐๐ฅ๐๐ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐พ๐๐ถ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐?
Sometimes a protocol is scientifically sound but misses ethical safeguards, privacy measures, or required documentation.
๐ฏ. ๐ช๐ผ๐๐น๐ฑ ๐ฎ ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ป๐ ๐ฐ๐น๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐น๐ ๐๐ป๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ ๐ถ๐ป๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป๐๐ฒ๐ป๐?
If patients cannot easily understand what they are agreeing to, expect questions from the reviewers.
๐ฐ. ๐๐ฎ๐ป ๐๐ผ๐ ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ณ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ ๐บ๐ฒ๐๐ต๐ผ๐ฑ๐ผ๐น๐ผ๐ด๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐น ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐?
Why this sample size? Why this tool? Why this analysis? If a reviewer asks, the protocol should already contain the answer.
๐ฑ. ๐๐ฎ๐ป ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐๐๐ฑ๐ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐น๐ถ๐๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐น๐น๐ ๐ฏ๐ฒ ๐ฑ๐ผ๐ป๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐๐ฒ๐ป?
A good protocol is not only scientifically correctโit should also be feasible in the actual clinical setting.
Remember:
Ethics approval is not the finish line. It is the beginning.
The strongest protocols are usually those that anticipate reviewer questions before they are asked.