Chester Donnally III, MD

Chester Donnally III, MD Spine Surgeon🔬 | Dallas Native⭐️ | Father🏡 | Spine Expert📚 | Technology Expert🤖 | Researcher🧐
(2)

As a third generation Texan, Dr. Donnally is compassionate to the needs of his community and the patients he serves in his native city of Dallas. He prides himself on performing the least invasive amount of surgery to alleviate a patient’s spinal pathology while concurrently accelerating their post-operative rehabilitation. Additionally, he stresses surgical techniques that minimize post-operative

pain and medication use. While Dr. Donnally is passionate about minimally invasive surgery he is also committed to complex corrective procedures for adult spinal deformities. Early in his career Dr. Donnally placed an emphasis on medical research. His contribution of more than 70 peer reviewed publications and a dozen book chapters has allowed him to be invited to many speaking engagements across the country to present his findings. He is dedicated to advancing the spinal community’s knowledge base through research and education. He continues to work with various scientific and product teams to identify modern techniques that will better diagnosis spinal conditions and manage these pathologies. A true local, Dr. Donnally graduated from Highland Park High School in Dallas and then earned Magna Cum Laude honors while at Southern Methodist University. While attending medical school at Texas Tech Health Science Center he graduated top of his class with a Distinction in Research. Dr. Donnally completed his Orthopedic Surgery training at University of Miami Hospital/Jackson Memorial Hospital. He continued his Spine Surgery training as a fellow at the world-renowned Rothman Institute in Philadelphia. He is a member of the Phi Beta Kappa and Alpha Omega Alpha honor societies. Additionally he earned the distinction of Eagle Scout with local Dallas Troop 82.

06/04/2026

“Snowshoe Footprint” Fusion Technology ❄️🦴

When patients have instability in the lumbar spine, sometimes the spine has a true foundation problem.

One way to address that foundation issue is with load-sharing architecture — similar to the way the Romans used arches for long-lasting structural support. 🏛️🏆🏆

This is a technology I frequently use from , and it has several really cool design features:

❄️ Snowshoe footprint
A larger surface area helps spread out the load and may reduce the risk of the cage pushing into the bone. 🥾

🏛️ Arch-based internal structure
The cage has reinforced architecture designed for strength, stability, and bone growth through the implant.

🛠️ SAFER SURGERY
Not to bury the lead, BUT one of my favorite parts: the INTEGRATED anchors are “built into” the cage delivery system.

With ALL other ‘screw’ integrated cage systems, surgeons may need multiple sharp instruments passing in and out near major blood vessels and abdominal structures. AT LEAST 6 PASSES!

With THIS system, the fixation is deployed through the cage delivery system — meaning 0 sharp passes and a more streamlined implantation process. ⚙️

Just another example of how modern spine technology can help improve stability, support fusion, and limit surgical risk for the right patient. 🦴🔥

06/01/2026

Lumbar spinal stenosis is a condition where the nerves in the lower back become squeezed. “Stenosis” is just a medical term for narrowing around the nerves. This can happen when the joints in the spine (called facet joints) and the surrounding tissues become thickened with age, when a disc herniates and pushes on the nerves, or when one vertebra slips forward on another (called spondylolisthesis), narrowing the spaces where the nerves travel. The good news is that these conditions are often very treatable.
It’s also important to know that many people have stenosis on an MRI without any symptoms at all. Getting the right diagnosis is the first step toward treating back pain, leg pain, numbness, or weakness.

05/23/2026

Three RADIOGRAPHIC Factors I Evaluate When Considering a Disc Replacement 👇

Cervical disc replacement can be an amazing motion-preserving option for the right patient, but patient selection matters.

When I’m evaluating someone for disc replacement, three things I pay close attention to are:

1️⃣ Severe disc height loss
If the disc space has collapsed by more than 50%, high impact studies have shown outcomes can become less predictable.

2️⃣ Instability or spondylolisthesis
This can suggest more significant arthritis or dysfunction in the posterior joints of the spine. A disc replacement ONLY treats the disc space in the front/middle part of the spine — it does not directly fix the facet joints in the back. Instability inherently implies facet dysfunction

3️⃣ Significant kyphosis
If the cervical spine is hunched too far forward, restoring motion with a disc replacement may not be the best option for every patient. Newer studies, have a challenged this notion, buuuut I’m OK being a traditionalist when it comes to CDAs.

There are definitely excellent surgeons who push the limits in select/many cases, and innovation is an important part of spine surgery. For my own patients, I tend to follow textbook IDE (Investigational Device Exemption) criteria and evidence-based guidelines closely. Practicing in the same city myself and my family were all born and raised in means -I’m not going anywhere, so for me- long-term outcomes are extraordinarily important!!

The goal is not just to do a newer surgery — the goal is to choose the surgery most likely to help that specific patient.

Address

17051 Dallas Pkwy #400
Addison, TX
75001

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Chester Donnally III, MD posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to Chester Donnally III, MD:

Featured

Share

Category