Kevin A. Kirby, DPM

Kevin A. Kirby, DPM We provide the most advanced podiatric care to our patients with an emphasis on the biomechanics of the foot and lower extremity.
(1)

Dr. Kevin Kirby graduated from the California College of Podiatric Medicine in 1983 and completed his first year surgical residency at the Veteran’s Administration Hospital in Palo Alto, California. He spent his second post-graduate year doing the Fellowship in Podiatric Biomechanics at CCPM where he also earned his MS degree. Dr. Kirby has authored or co-authored 27 articles in peer-reviewed jour

nals, has authored or co-authored five book chapters, and has authored five books on foot and lower extremity biomechanics and orthosis therapy, all five of which have been translated into Spanish language editions. He has invented the subtalar joint axis palpation technique, the anterior axial radiographic projection, the supination resistance test, the maximum pronation test and the medial heel skive and lateral heel skive orthosis techniques. He has also created and developed the Subtalar Joint Axis Location and Rotational Equilibrium Theory of Foot Function and has co-developed the Subtalar Joint Equilibrium and Tissue Stress Approach to Biomechanical Therapy of the Foot and Lower Extremity. He has lectured internationally on 33 separate occasions in China, Spain, Belgium, New Zealand, Australia, England, Dominican Republic and Canada over the past 23 years on foot and lower extremity biomechanics, foot orthoses, and sports medicine. He has also lectured extensively throughout the United States. Dr. Kirby is a member of the editorial advisory board for the Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association and a manuscript reviewer for the Journal of Biomechanics, Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Medicine and Science in Sport and Exercise, Journal of Foot and Ankle Research and Journal of Sports Sciences. He is currently an Adjunct Associate Professor in the Department of Applied Biomechanics at the California School of Podiatric Medicine and has a full time podiatric biomechanics and surgical practice in Sacramento, California.

Finite Element Analysis of Lower Extremity Demonstrates that Valgus-Wedged Insoles Reduce Medial Intra-Compartmental Pre...
06/09/2026

Finite Element Analysis of Lower Extremity Demonstrates that Valgus-Wedged Insoles Reduce Medial Intra-Compartmental Pressures at Knee Joint

Valgus-wedged insoles are widely applied in the conservative treatment for medial knee osteoarthritis. Experimental studies have been conducted to understand the effectiveness of such an orthotic intervention using three-dimensional (3D) gait analysis, force plates and other methods.

In this finite element analysis (FEA) study from 2013, a 3D FEA model of the human knee–ankle–foot complex, together with valgus-wedged orthoses, were used to investigate the redistribution of knee stress using orthoses with no wedge, a 5-degree and a 10-degree valgus wedge. The FEA model was constructed from magnetic resonance images of the subject's foot and lower extremity. Motion analysis data and muscle forces were input to drive the model. The established FEA model was employed to investigate the loading responses of tibiofemoral articulation in three orthosis conditions during simulated walking.

Both the 5° or 10° valgus-wedged orthoses resulted in significant decreases in von Mises stress and contact force at the medial femur cartilage region and within the medial meniscus when compared to the 0° insole condition. [Von Mises stress, often called "equivalent stress", is a single scalar value used by engineers to predict if a ductile material will yield or permanently deform under complex, multi-directional loading.]

This 3D FEA experiment demonstrated how valgus-wedged orthoses immediately reduce the stress and contact force within the medial compartment of the knee joint. The use of these valgus-wedged orthoses may be used to reduce the pain and disability of medial knee joint osteoarthritis (Liu X, Zhang M: Redistribution of knee stress using laterally wedged insole intervention: finite element analysis of knee–ankle–foot complex. Clinical Biomechanics, 28(1):61-67, 2013).

I have also written an article on the use of valgus-wedged orthoses for the treatment of medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee which may be of help for additional review on the biomechanical concepts involved in this form of conservative treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis.

Kirby KA: Can foot orthoses have an impact on knee osteoarthritis? Podiatry Today. 28(10):50-60, 2015.

https://www.hmpgloballearningnetwork.com/site/podiatry/can-foot-orthoses-have-impact-knee-osteoarthritis

Effective Use of Valgus-Wedged Custom Foot Orthoses in the Treatment of Medial Knee OsteoarthritisI have used valgus-wed...
06/08/2026

Effective Use of Valgus-Wedged Custom Foot Orthoses in the Treatment of Medial Knee Osteoarthritis

I have used valgus-wedged insoles and orthoses in the treatment of mild to moderate medial knee osteoarthritis (OA) for more than three decades with good results. Valgus insoles have been used to treat medial knee OA within the orthopedic surgery community for at least the past half century.

Valgus-wedged insoles/orthoses act to effectively reduce the pain of medial knee OA by shifting ground reaction force (GRF) more laterally on the plantar foot during weightbearing activities. In turn, this lateral shift in GRF decreases the external knee adduction moment which, in turn, lessens the magnitude of compression force acting between the medial distal femur and medial proximal tibia within the medial knee compartment.

In my illustration below, I show a foot standing on a flat shoe insole (left), where the location of the center of pressure (CoP) will be located in a more central position on the plantar forefoot. With the simple addition of two layers of 1/8" (3 mm) adhesive felt (or other similar material) from the rearfoot to the forefoot to the insole of the shoe of a patient with medial knee OA, a temporary valgus rearfoot-midfoot-forefoot wedge may be created. This temporary valgus insole is used to test the mechanical effects of valgus wedging on the pain of the patient with medial knee OA during walking gait (center).

Once the valgus-wedged insole is placed inside the shoe of the patient with medial knee OA, the GRF, and the CoP, are shifted more laterally on the plantar foot relative to the flat-insole condition with no valgus wedge (right). This lateral shift in CoP acting on the plantar foot, in turn, reduces the magnitude of external knee adduction moment and the internal compression forces within the medial compartment of the knee.

Of course, the use of a valgus wedged insole may increase the pronated position of the foot, so patients must be monitored carefully over time to ensure that no pronation-related symptoms (e.g., posterior tibial tendinitis) are being created by the use of these valgus-wedged insoles. In general, however, from my years of using this type of insole modification, small valgus wedges produce good results at the knee for patients with medial knee OA with a minimum of pronation-related pathology at the foot and ankle.

Simple in-office shoe modifications such as the valgus-wedged insole described above are very useful clinical tools for determining whether valgus wedging will help reduce medial knee pain during walking in patients with medial knee OA. In addition, temporary valgus-wedged insoles are very helpful in determining the optimal amount of valgus wedging that may be required in a more permanent custom valgus-wedged foot orthosis with a lateral heel skive that can provide a more durable in-shoe treatment solution for patients who suffer from the pain of mild to moderate medial knee OA during weightbearing activities.

Medial Heel Skive Orthoses Found to Help Patellofemoral SyndromeMy medial heel skive technique, which I first described ...
06/07/2026

Medial Heel Skive Orthoses Found to Help Patellofemoral Syndrome

My medial heel skive technique, which I first described within the medical literature 34 years ago (Kirby KA: The medial heel skive technique: improving pronation control in foot orthoses. JAPMA, 82: 177-188, 1992), has been used in a research study of foot orthosis treatment of patellofemoral syndrome.

Custom foot orthoses with medial heel skive modifications were used in 14 patients with patellofemoral syndrome and found to improve knee symptoms. Data analyses indicated significant (P=0.008) improvements in weight bearing pain after 4 weeks of using the orthosis with the medial heel skive technique (Bahramian F, Aminian G, Bagherzadeh M, Fardipoor S, Kashani V. The Effect of Custom Made Foot Orthoses Fabricated With Medial Heel Skive Technique on Pain and Function in Individuals With Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome. Iranian Rehabilitation Journal. 2017; 15(1):37-42).

https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/109386558/article-1-548-en-libre.pdf?1703200540=&response-content-disposition=inline%3B+filename%3DThe_Effect_of_Custom_Made_Foot_Orthoses.pdf&Expires=1780847655&Signature=V5HoK50gZumADmOI8DJAM8O2jmRcVYFKyNAEadKs39ucLQbtFjc8RzhfqqHoQFG5d5n54DHQiXqibk--btgA-O9XFXoD0EEngBoJM~BN9rG7fr7kMMnkMQiHZKIztVj3LGx9UEP3NS6FqYTz6ssBUgpHqmoQSNhyCh2GOv7pwgdfhdHTUZS7faRtYqHGtfrAfXfR1Q-~jQDGPczrXr9P0ZBL1RMFfsmOBm~vv27Wl2~nUCjDvfqJZU1jCzSr4lsrFqu8GypsNB0qL3PzbdA34ZL69Wu0yJAPXSxt8vR6HiOWfZHbPPx9UFRXIYLI6eJM05pRIcM6ZiNK~qYZlrjTzQ__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZA

In addition to the medial heel skive modification, I will also use a varus forefoot extension for runners with patellofemoral syndrome in their custom foot orthoses. The combination of the medial heel skive increasing the subtalar joint (STJ) supination moment at the rearfoot and the varus forefoot extension increasing STJ supination moment at the forefoot will work synergistically with each other to reduce the abnormal STJ pronation motion during the first half of support phase of running which is the likely etiology of patallofemoral syndrome (see my illustrations below).

Custom Foot Orthoses Modifications for Treating Medial Tibial Stress SyndromeI have been treating medial tibial stress s...
06/06/2026

Custom Foot Orthoses Modifications for Treating Medial Tibial Stress Syndrome

I have been treating medial tibial stress syndrome (MTSS) for the past 41 years as a sports podiatrist. For the last 30 years, after many trial-and-error modifications of different orthosis designs, I have used the orthoses shown in these photos very successfully in treating not only MTSS, but also in patients a history of medial tibial stress fracture (MTSF).

Since MTSS is probably a bone-bending injury to the tibia, and since the runners with MTSS tend to have a relatively high varus forefoot strike angle, then my reasoning in adding forefoot varus extensions to orthoses for runners with MTSS was to decrease the valgus bending moments on the tibia. Once I started using varus forefoot extensions on the custom orthoses for my runner-patients with MTSS, my success rate with orthoses got 2-3 times better than without forefoot extensions.

The varus forefoot extension is sometimes initially placed on the orthosis topcover with 1/8" adhesive felt, but is more commonly placed on the orthosis with 1/8"korex (which is a rubberized cork material very similar in consistency to EVA). Many times, I will then use test pieces of 1/8" adhesive felt to increase the varus forefoot correction in my office until the best forefoot varus angle is found for the forefoot extension, which is then replaced with an equal layer of korex.

The varus forefoot extension is placed plantar to the topcover from the 1st to 4th metatarsal heads, with the 5th metatarsal head having no korex underneath it. I grind the varus forefoot extension so that it is thinned to a feather-edge between the 4th and 5th metatarsal head, with its maximum thickness at the medial edge of the forefoot extension.

The remainder of the orthosis is made of either a polypropylene shell or a Plastazote #3 shell material, depending on the patient and their needs. A medial heel skive of 2-4 mm is nearly always used in the orthosis. Also, a rearfoot post and a congruent medial arch in order is always used to try and shift the ground reaction force from lateral to medial at footstrike and during the first half of support phase, when the tibial valgus bending moments are likely at their greatest magnitudes.

I recommend to the patient that they use these specially-designed orthoses for running since the varus forefoot extension of the orthosis generally is very well tolerated in running but has a slight potential to cause functional hallux limitus in some patients while walking. This custom foot orthosis design has been very successful in treating both high-level elite athletes and recreational athletes with MTSS and a history of MTSF. Time after time, in my early experimentation with different custrom orthosis designs to treat MTSS, orthoses without forefoot varus extensions were mediocre at relieving the pain of MTSS. Using effectively-designed varus forefoot extensions on orthoses has been one of the keys to success over my decades of treating runners and other athletes with this disabling condition.

Here is a paper I wrote on this subject 16 years ago based on 60 published research papers.

Kirby KA: Current concepts in treating medial tibial stress syndrome. Podiatry Today. 23(4):52-57, 2010.

https://www.hmpgloballearningnetwork.com/site/podiatry/current-concepts-in-treating-medial-tibial-stress-syndrome

Dr. Jinsup Song, and his daughter, Kieun, came to visit me in my office two days ago.  Dr. Song is a PhD-podiatrist who ...
06/06/2026

Dr. Jinsup Song, and his daughter, Kieun, came to visit me in my office two days ago. Dr. Song is a PhD-podiatrist who has published numerous papers on foot and lower extremity biomechanics and still is teaching at the Temple University School of Podiatric Medicine in Philadelphia. Dr. Song and I have lectured together on a few locations at podiatry seminars. Pam joined the three of us for a sushi dinner at Mikuni's after a day at the office. It was fun to catch up with Jinsup again and meet his talented daughter, Kieun.

06/05/2026

Forefoot Plantarflexion Test

16 years ago, in 2010, I first described the Forefoot Plantarflexion Test. The Forefoot Plantarflexion Test is very useful clinically to determine inflammation at the dorsal capsular ligaments and their osseous insertion points on the dorsal margins of the midfoot joints in Dorsal Midfoot Interosseous Compression Syndrome (DMICS) and other dorsal midfoot pathologies.

To properly perform the Forefoot Plantarflexion Test, have the patient sit on the exam table. Then grasp the medial or lateral forefoot (with the thumb dorsally and fingers plantarly) of the patient's foot. With the other hand, grasp and cup the posterior calcaneus and pull the calcaneus towards yourself slightly to stabilize the ankle joint.

Now, plantarflex the forefoot on the rearfoot to place a tension force on the dorsal joint ligaments of the midfoot and midtarsal joints. The Forefoot Plantarflexion Test is positive if the patient reacts with pain when the forefoot is plantarflexed on the rearfoot.

A positive Forefoot Plantarflexion Test indicates either dorsal capsular ligamentous injury in the midfoot/midtarsal joints and/or subchondral bone injury at the dorsal midfoot/midtarsal joint surfaces where the capsular ligaments are attached. The Forefoot Plantarflexion Test is always positive in DMICS, in midfoot crush injuries and in Lisfranc’s joint injuries and helps the examiner objectively determine healing from midfoot/midtarsal joint injuries.

The Forefoot Plantarflexion Test can be modified by using variations in locations in manual pressure on the dorsal forefoot so that each individual metatarsal ray or a group of metatarsal rays may be tested simultaneously.

[Reprinted with permission from Kirby KA: “Prescribing Better Foot Orthoses: Lateral-Dorsal Midfoot Pain”, June 2010. In Kirby KA: Foot and Lower Extremity Biomechanics IV: Precision Intricast Newsletters, 2009-2013. Precision Intricast, Inc., Payson, AZ, 2014., pp. 95-96.]

Modifications to Increase Medial Longitudinal Arch Stiffness of Custom Foot OrthosisIn my 41 years of private practice, ...
06/05/2026

Modifications to Increase Medial Longitudinal Arch Stiffness of Custom Foot Orthosis

In my 41 years of private practice, I have made approximately 30,000 pairs of custom foot orthoses for patients who have a very wide wide variety of mechanically-based foot and lower extremity pathologies. However, many times, I have found that the custom orthoses ordered for these patients may not be the perfect prescription for them and either may not be working as well for the patient as I expected, or may be causing symptoms other than that which these patients initially presented with.

One of the complaints that patients may have with their orthoses is that they feel as if their orthoses are not high enough in the medial longitudinal arch (MLA) of their foot. This may, in fact, occur asymmetrically, with one orthosis feeling "perfect" and the other orthosis feeling "too low in the arch".

Also, patients may find that the symptoms caused by over-flattening of their MLA (e.g., distal plantar fasciitis, dorsal midfoot interosseous compression syndrome) or caused by excessive pronation of their subtalar joint (e.g., posterior tibial tendinitis/dysfunction, sinus tarsi syndrome), are not responding as well as they should with their custom foot orthoses. In these cases, an adjustment to the orthosis is necessary to improve the patient's comfort and lessen their discomfort.

One adjustment which may allow the original prescribed foot orthosis to still be used without recasting the patient to make a new custom foot orthosis is one which I have been routinely using in my practice for nearly 40 years. In order to increase the MLA height of the orthosis in a shank independent shell material, such as polypropylene, I will often cut one or two pieces of 1/4" or 1/8" adhesive felt to place into the plantar MLA of the orthosis to help stiffen the MLA of the orthosis. If this orthosis modification works well for the patient, then it is replaced with a more durable material (e.g. korex or EVA) that will provide a more long-lasting MLA support and improvement in the mechanical function of the foot orthosis for the patient.

In effect, this stiffening of the MLA of the orthosis with a plantar arch-filler pad does not actually increase the height of the MLA of the orthosis when the orthosis rests on a flat surface. Rather, the plantar arch-filler pad only increases the MLA height of the orthosis when the patient steps onto the orthosis. This effect is due to the mechanical fact that a stiffer MLA in a foot orthosis will cause the MLA of the orthosis to deform much less in the MLA when the patient is performing their weightbearing activities on top of the orthosis.

The addition of this plantar MLA filler to custom foot orthoses is one of the best ways to increase the MLA-supporting and anti-pronation abilities of orthoses without necessarily needing to remake a totally new orthosis for the patient. By stiffening the MLA of the orthosis with varying thicknesses of plantar arch-filler pads, the foot-health clinician may precisely tune the MLA of the orthosis to optimize the therapeutic effect of their custom foot orthoses for their patients.

Dorsal Midfoot Interosseous Compression Syndrome (DMICS)Over 29 years ago, in February 1997,  I first coined the term "D...
06/02/2026

Dorsal Midfoot Interosseous Compression Syndrome (DMICS)

Over 29 years ago, in February 1997, I first coined the term "Dorsal Midfoot Interosseous Compression Syndrome" (DMICS) to describe a midfoot pathology that I frequently saw, but no one had previously described within the medical literature. Now, DMICS is recognized by many podiatrists around the world as a relatively common cause of dorsal midfoot pain (Kirby KA.:Dorsal Midfoot Insterosseous Compression Syndreome, February 1997 Precision Intricast Newsletter, in: Kirby, KA: Foot and Lower Extremity Biomechanics: A Ten Year Collection of Precision Intricast Newsletters. Precision Intricast, Inc., Payson, AZ, 1997, pp. 165-166).

Patients with DMICS complain of pain along the dorsal aspects of their midfoot joints during weightbearing activities. Upon taking the history, patients with DMICS point to the area of the metatarsal-cuneiform joints, navicular-cuneiform joints, and sometimes to the area of the metatarsal-cuboid joint as the source of most of their pain.

Much less frequently, the pain is noted more proximally, in the dorsal aspects of either the talo-navicular or calcaneo-cuboid joints. The pain generally worsens with increased weightbearing activities and patients report the pain from DMICS will either occur just before heel off and/or at the initiation of propulsion of walking gait. Walking barefoot or in low-heeled shoes usually exacerbates the pain, while walking in shoes that are loosely tied with an increased heel height (i.e., heel drop) usually eases the pain. There is usually no history of trauma even though patients with blunt trauma to the dorsal midfoot area of the foot may complain of very similar symptoms.

On physical examination of the patient with DMICS, there is discrete tenderness along the dorsal joint lines of the affected midfoot joints but no tenderness along the dorsal aspects of the extensor tendons with dorsiflexion resistance applied at the digits. Edema is never present plantarly and minimal edema is detected at the dorsal midfoot in only the more severe cases of DMICS.

There is no pain with forceful manual dorsiflexion of the forefoot on the rearfoot. However, there is very significant pain with plantarflexion of the forefoot on the rearfoot. This test, the Forefoot Plantarflexion Test (see illustration below), is the key examination finding in patients with DMICS. All patients with DMICS have very significant pain with plantarflexion of the forefoot on the rearfoot. The Forefoot Plantarflexion Test is a remarkably sensitive indicator of the level of severity of DMICS.

The most likely reason that manual plantarflexion of the forefoot on the rearfoot during the Forefoot Plantarflexion Test causes such significant and consistent pain in patients with DMICS is that the dorsal margins of the midfoot joints have, over time, developed microfractures and/or bone edema due to the excessive compression forces within their dorsal midfoot joints (see illustration below).

I predicted the MRI finding of "bone bruising" and subchondral bone injury in the dorsal midfoot joints in 2010 (Kirby KA: "Prescribing Better Foot Orthoses: Lateral-Dorsal Midfoot Pain", June 2010 Precision Intricast Newsletter, in: Kirby KA: Foot and Lower Extremity Biomechanics IV: Precision Intricast Newsletters, 2009-2013. Precision Intricast, Inc., Payson, AZ, 2014, pp. 95-96).

15 years after I predicted subchondral bone injury in patients suffering from DMICS, the MRI finding of dorsal midfoot joint bone edema was finally confirmed in patients with DMICS (i.e. dorsal midfoot pain) by Jill Halstead, PhD and coworkers in 2025, (Halstead J, Martín‐Hervás C, Hensor EM, Keenan AM, Conaghan PG, McGonagle D, Arnold JB, Jones J, Redmond AC. Association between clinical and MRI‐detected imaging findings for people with midfoot pain, a cross‐sectional study. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research. 2025 Mar;18(1):e70019). See the MRI image from the paper by Halstead et al below.

The dorsal capsular ligaments which attach to these damaged area of dorsal midfoot joint bone will pull on these areas of damaged bone which causes pain during propulsion, when the forefoot is plantarflexing on the rearfoot due to the windlass effect. Again, the cause of the bone damage within the dorsal articular margins of the midfoot joints is the chronic excessive interosseous compression force (ICF) in dorsal surfaces of these midfoot joints during weightbearing activities.

The combination of three main forces act together on and within the foot during late midstance to cause an increase in the ICF across the dorsal joint surfaces of the midfoot (see illustration). First, the weight of the body exerts a plantarly directed force through the tibia onto the talar dome at the ankle joint. This ankle joint compression force is increased by any tension forces within the Achilles tendon, tendons of the deep posterior compartment muscles and peroneal muscle tendons.

Second, due to the biomechanical requirements of the gastrocnemius and soleus muscles to be active during late midstance, the Achilles tendon has large tension forces which cause a rearfoot plantarflexion moment which, in turn, has a tendency to flatten the longitudinal arch of the foot. Lastly, since the center of mass of the body is over the metatarsal heads during late midstance, ground reaction force (GRF) is at its peak on the metatarsal heads which causes a dorsiflexion moment on the forefoot.

The net result of these three forces acting together is a very strong flattening force or "arch-flattening moment" on both the medial and lateral longitudinal arches of the foot. The stronger the flattening moments on the medial and lateral longitudinal arches, the greater is the ICF across the dorsal joint surfaces of the midfoot. The arch-flattening moments on both the medial and lateral longitudinal arches are increased by such factors as increased body weight, low heeled shoes and limited ankle joint dorsiflexion. Weak plantar ligaments and weak plantar intrinsic and plantar extrinsic muscles also increase the dorsal ICF at the midfoot since these ligaments and muscles help prevent medial and lateral longitudinal arch collapse.

Repetitive micro-trauma at these dorsal midfoot joint surfaces with each step is the likely etiology for the pain from DMICS. Treatment revolves around both reducing the inflammation to the dorsal midfoot joints and trying to eliminate the mechanical factors causing the increased flattening moments on the medial and lateral longitudinal arches. Local treatment to reduce inflammation may include relacing shoes to form a "lace-gap" over the symptomatic area of the dorsal midfoot (see illustration below). Choosing shoes that do not cross dorsally over the affected area of the dorsal midfoot also is helpful for these patients. In addition, icing and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and even cortisone injections may be necessary in resistant cases. The worst cases are treated initially with cam-walker brace boot walkers for 3-6 weeks.

Mechanical treatment involves, first of all, having the patient stretch their Achilles tendon and either adding a heel lift to their shoes or getting them into a slightly higher heeled shoe. Most helpful is to prevent the medial and lateral longitudinal arches from collapsing during gait as much as possible with either padding, strapping or prescription foot orthoses. The foot orthoses must be stiff enough to support the medial and lateral longitudinal arches and should be well contoured to the foot. I find that if the initial treatment of the patient with temporary insoles or padding is helpful, the patient is very happy to proceed further with the more corrective and much more beneficial prescription foot orthoses since DMICS can be quite a painful and debilitating condition. Proper conservative treatment, outlined above, is routinely very effective.

Forefoot Plantarflexion Test - A Valuable Clinical TestI first described the Forefoot Plantarflexion Test 16 years ago i...
06/01/2026

Forefoot Plantarflexion Test - A Valuable Clinical Test

I first described the Forefoot Plantarflexion Test 16 years ago in my June 2010 Precision Intricast Newsletter (Kirby KA: “Prescribing Better Foot Orthoses: Lateral-Dorsal Midfoot Pain”, June 2010. In Kirby KA: Foot and Lower Extremity Biomechanics IV: Precision Intricast Newsletters, 2009-2013. Precision Intricast, Inc., Payson, AZ, 2014., pp. 95-96.].

The Forefoot Plantarflexion Test is very useful clinically to determine whether there is inflammation present at the dorsal capsular ligaments and their osseous insertion points on the dorsal margins of the midfoot joints. These joints are commonly involved in Dorsal Midfoot Interosseous Compression Syndrome (DMICS) and other dorsal midfoot pathologies.

https://www.facebook.com/kevinakirbydpm/posts/dorsal-midfoot-interosseous-compression-syndrome-dmicsover-22-years-ago-i-first-/2215979281832636/

To properly perform the Forefoot Plantarflexion Test, have the patient sit on the exam table. Then grasp the medial or lateral forefoot (with the thumb dorsally and fingers plantarly) of the patient's foot. With the other hand, grasp and cup the posterior calcaneus and pull the calcaneus towards yourself slightly to stabilize the ankle joint from plantarflexing during the Forefoot Plantarflexion Test.

Now, plantarflex the forefoot on the rearfoot to place a tension force on the dorsal joint ligaments of the midfoot and midtarsal joints. The Forefoot Plantarflexion Test is positive if the patient reacts with pain when the forefoot is plantarflexed on the rearfoot.
A positive Forefoot Plantarflexion Test indicates either dorsal capsular ligamentous injury in the midfoot/midtarsal joints and/or subchondral bone injury at the dorsal midfoot/midtarsal joint surfaces where the capsular ligaments are attached.

The Forefoot Plantarflexion Test is always positive in DMICS, with midfoot crush injuries and with Lisfranc’s joint injuries. This valuable clinical test helps the podiatrist and foot-health prectitioner objectively determine not only the diagnosis involved in dorsal midfoot pain but also helps determine the extent of healing from midfoot/midtarsal joint injuries. '

The Forefoot Plantarflexion Test can aldo be modified by using variations in locations in manual pressure on the dorsal forefoot so that each individual metatarsal ray or a group of metatarsal rays may be tested simultaneously. This variation of the test helps isolate pain at one dorsal midfoot joint, versus adjacent dorsal midfoot joints.

Address

5120 Manzanita Avenue, #100
Carmichael, CA
95608

Opening Hours

Monday 8:30am - 5pm
Tuesday 8:30am - 5pm
Wednesday 8:30am - 5pm
Thursday 8:30am - 5pm
Friday 8:30am - 5pm

Telephone

+19169258111

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Kevin A. Kirby, DPM posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Share

Category