05/23/2026
Edition 19 of The Neuropsychiatry Brief is a long one, and I am not apologizing for that because this week I had a lot to say. Usually, I focus on a medication, mechanism, receptor, circuit, clinical trial, or emerging area of neuropsychiatry. This week is different. This week is about the third party in the room: insurance.
It is about prior authorizations, medication denials, specialty pharmacy disruptions, credentialing delays, post-payment audits, and clients being told they cannot have the treatment their clinician believes they need. It is about clinicians spending hours fighting administrative barriers instead of providing care. It is about staff buried under phone calls, appeals, pharmacy issues, and angry clients who often do not realize the office is fighting the same system they are.
And I have had enough.
In this edition, I talk about why I chose not to take insurance in my private practice, the difference between practicing psychiatry with clinical judgment versus cost-containment logic, and the moral injury of knowing what a client needs while watching a payer delay, deny, redirect, or obstruct the plan without carrying the clinical liability.
I am done being quiet about it. If these systems want clinicians to keep absorbing the damage in silence, they are making a mistake. I am bringing the flashlight with one million lumens and pointing it exactly where it needs to go, so I hope they have their sunglasses on. I will write, appeal, file complaints, boost posts, run ads, put up videos, and explain denials in plain language so clients, families, employers, regulators, and policymakers understand what is happening.
Whatever it takes, I will be relentless, because sunlight is not rude, accountability is not aggression, and telling the truth about a broken system is not the problem. The problem is that the system has operated in the dark for far too long.
My hope is that others start becoming comfortable being uncomfortable too. Ask why the medication was denied. Ask who wrote the policy. Ask whether it is evidence-based. Ask who carries responsibility when a denial delays care. Ask why the clinician carries the liability while the payer controls access.
If we are serious about mental health, we have to be serious about the machinery that blocks mental health care. Edition 19 is about that machinery, and I am done letting it run quietly in the background.
We are going to do something different this week. Most editions of this brief begin with a medication, a mechanism, a receptor, a circuit, a trial design problem, or an emerging treatment that may change how we think about psychiatric illness.