It’s Not About The Cookie

It’s Not About The Cookie Areas of focus include: hormone balancing, menopause, sugar imbalance, & weightloss.

Health Coach & Functional Nutritionist utilizing the Mind-Body connection to help men & women discover & reframe habits of change to achieve their health goals.

This is BIG news for women’s health. On September 17, 2026, the FDA is holding a public meeting specifically on TESTOSTE...
08/22/2026

This is BIG news for women’s health. On September 17, 2026, the FDA is holding a public meeting specifically on TESTOSTERONE USE IN MENOPAUSAL WOMEN.

Read that again, because this has been a long time coming.

Throughout their lives women have produced testosterone. Women have experienced dramatic changes in androgen physiology across aging and menopause. Women have been prescribed testosterone off-label. Other countries have authorized testosterone treatment for women with HSDD. And yet, in the United States, there is still not a single FDA-approved testosterone product specifically formulated and dosed for women.

Unfortunately, that is not changing tomorrow. This meeting is NOT an FDA endorsement of testosterone for menopause. It is NOT an approval. It’s still going to be a long road. But, the conversation has reached the FDA. After the majority of comments regarding the male dosed testosterone discussion at the FDA last year being from women asking for consideration, this discussion is moving forward!

Let’s look at what they actually intend to discuss. The FDA says the meeting will examine testosterone physiology across a woman’s lifespan, the challenges of measuring and interpreting testosterone blood levels, and the evidence surrounding testosterone and:

• sexual function
• cognition
• mood and depressive symptoms
• sleep
• frailty
• musculoskeletal health
• cardiovascular safety
• breast safety

Do you see it is NOT just hypoactive sexual desire disorder?!? Big big big!

They continue that the meeting is intended to help “inform future research and potential drug development of testosterone products for menopausal women.” Potential. Drug. Development.

They will even discuss what evidence, clinical endpoints, trial designs, and safety data would be necessary to support a future marketing application for testosterone in menopausal women. That is HUGE.

One of the strangest problems in women’s health is this crazy circle. There is no FDA-approved testosterone product for women → clinicians are reluctant to prescribe testosterone because there is no FDA-approved product → women who do receive it often use compounded testosterone or tiny fractions of products manufactured for men → standardized female dosing and large-scale outcome data remain limited → and the lack of evidence and approved products is then used to justify continued reluctance. Lather, rinse, repeat.

At some point, the FDA needs to clarify what research would actually allow us to move forward? The FDA is now formally asking that question.

I am VERY interested in their decision to include testosterone measurement and interpretation, because this desperately needs attention.

What does a serum testosterone number actually tell us about androgen activity in an individual woman? How should total testosterone, free testosterone, and SHBG be interpreted? How reliable are assays at the concentrations typically seen in women? What levels correlate with symptoms, benefits or adverse effects? Should laboratory reference ranges become treatment targets vs age related norms? What outcomes should we actually be measuring?

I’m also thrilled that the discussion isn’t being restricted entirely to libido. Finally. Hallelujah. Sexual function matters enormously and should never be minimized. HSDD is also where we currently have the strongest evidence for testosterone therapy in postmenopausal women. But women have been asking questions about muscle, bone, frailty, cognition, mood, sleep and metabolic health for a very long time. But the most common pathway to testosterone options is through the one portal that also affects men enormously. It might be coincidental, but it’s time to look at the whole woman.

The correct response to insufficient evidence isn’t to pretend those questions don’t exist. LET’S DO THE RESEARCH.

There is another opportunity here that I hope women’s-health clinicians, researchers and advocates (US!) take very seriously. The FDA has opened a public docket for comments, evidence and data, and the agency specifically says that patient perspectives will be explored.

That means this conversation doesn’t have to happen about menopausal women without menopausal women. We can share our experiences, thoughts, stories, etc. This is our moment. I am not including the link in the post, because…algorithms. I might add it in the comments (I’m not sure how much that affects this.). But I ask you to take a second to look for the link understanding I am prioritizing as many women as possible see this opportunity.

Again, none of this tells us what the FDA will ultimately conclude. But after watching women use a hormone their own bodies produce through products designed for men, while dealing with the attitude that absence of an FDA-approved female product is evidence that their treatment is somehow illegitimate…I find this incredibly encouraging.

This isn’t approval, but it’s an important step forward and if’s coming SOON.

September 17.

I’ll be watching. Very, very closely.

The p***s will predict a heart attack in 3-5 years...check out this post on LinkedIn.
06/16/2026

The p***s will predict a heart attack in 3-5 years...check out this post on LinkedIn.

Sign in or join now to see posts like this one and more.

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/hormonehealthishealth-testosteroneforall-ugcPost-7462601747941818369-mTjE/?utm_source=sha...
06/16/2026

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/hormonehealthishealth-testosteroneforall-ugcPost-7462601747941818369-mTjE/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAACLOopUBEeKcneoqmTO0IJSIHnyhFfr3M-Q

Thank you to Dr. Sunbal (Somi) Javaid for continuing to push this conversation forward. “Testosterone is not just a male hormone.” Too many women are still dismissed, undereducated, or told their symptoms are just something they have to live with. We believe hormone health deserves better scienc...

Maintaining muscle is crucial for health aging, longevity, metabolism, blood sugar regulation and so much more!! Check o...
06/16/2026

Maintaining muscle is crucial for health aging, longevity, metabolism, blood sugar regulation and so much more!! Check out this episode.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GVsq67RNox0

Dr. Gabrielle Lyon doesn’t just talk about strength—she reframes it, revealing how building muscle is a daily practice of resilience, clarity, and long-term ...

The way we think about GLP-1 medications is changing rapidly.What began as a treatment for type 2 diabetes has expanded ...
06/01/2026

The way we think about GLP-1 medications is changing rapidly.

What began as a treatment for type 2 diabetes has expanded far beyond blood sugar management. These medications gained attention for weight loss, but the science is revealing something much bigger.

Today, GLP-1 therapies are being used, studied, or approved for a growing number of health conditions, including:

• Type 2 diabetes
• Obesity management
• Cardiovascular risk reduction
• Obstructive sleep apnea
• Chronic kidney disease
• Fatty liver disease (MASH/MASLD)
• Insulin resistance
• Metabolic syndrome
• PCOS-related metabolic concerns
• Addiction and craving research
• Chronic inflammatory conditions

What makes this so significant is that the conversation is no longer centered solely on weight.

Many healthcare providers are looking at GLP-1 medications through a broader metabolic lens, focusing on:

• Insulin sensitivity
• Systemic inflammation
• Visceral fat accumulation
• Cardiometabolic risk
• Liver health
• Sleep quality
• Long-term disease prevention
• Overall metabolic resilience

That represents a major shift in how we approach chronic disease.

Emerging research suggests that GLP-1 therapies may help reduce major cardiovascular events in certain high-risk populations, improve insulin resistance, decrease inflammatory burden, support liver health, and even play a role in treating obstructive sleep apnea in adults with obesity.

Another area generating significant interest is the relationship between metabolic dysfunction and cancer risk.

Excess body fat, chronic inflammation, and elevated insulin levels have all been associated with increased risk for several cancers, including breast, colorectal, endometrial, pancreatic, kidney, and esophageal cancers. As a result, metabolic health is becoming an increasingly important topic within preventative oncology discussions.

Perhaps the most fascinating aspect of this evolution is what it reveals about conditions we’ve often accepted as “normal.”

Insulin resistance.
Fatty liver disease.
Sleep apnea.
Chronic inflammation.
Excess visceral fat.

For years, many of these issues were viewed as unavoidable consequences of aging rather than opportunities for early intervention.

That mindset is beginning to change.

Healthcare is moving toward identifying and addressing metabolic dysfunction earlier—before it progresses into more serious chronic disease.

I believe the future of disease prevention will place a much greater emphasis on metabolic health than it does today.

This is no longer simply a discussion about weight loss.

It’s becoming a conversation about improving healthspan, reducing chronic disease risk, and helping people live healthier lives for longer.

My approach focuses on identifying metabolic patterns and laboratory markers that often appear years before chronic disease develops.

Educational purposes only. This content is not intended as medical advice.

03/23/2026


*JOIN THE PHYSIONIC INSIDERS [PREMIUM CONTENT]*Join the Physionic Insiders: https://bit.ly/PhysionicInsiders2 *HEALTH AUTONOMY [COURSE]*Learn to Analyze & Ap...

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/GSJ39cciQmQ
03/18/2026

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/GSJ39cciQmQ

Most people think they’d spot lab-grown meat. But the label doesn’t say “lab-grown.”It says things like: Cell-cultivated. Cultured. Made from animal cells.Th...

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/2ZVdFqboUMI
03/18/2026

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/2ZVdFqboUMI

Some research suggests statins may cause adverse side effects more often in women than in men. One proposed explanation involves the X chromosome and differe...

Address

Los Angeles, CA

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when It’s Not About The Cookie posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Featured

Share