08/07/2026
Are they using children to justify prohibition?
Sen. Ted Budd says pediatric cannabis "poisonings" have increased 461% since 2018 and that Congress must eliminate the h**p loophole.
Let's add some context.
First, "poisoning" is a medical term. It does NOT mean children are dying. The overwhelming majority of children who accidentally ingest THC gummies recover, even if some require emergency treatment or overnight observation.
Second, parents have a responsibility to keep potentially dangerous substances away from children. Kids are hospitalized every year after getting into prescription medications, alcohol, ni****ne products, household cleaners, laundry detergent pods, and countless other hazardous items. We don't generally respond by banning those products.
Third, if the concern is that gummies look like candy, there are policy options besides prohibition:
• Child-resistant packaging
• Clear warning labels
• Restrictions on marketing that appeals to children
• Secure storage education
• Enforcement against companies that ignore safety standards
Instead, some lawmakers are using these statistics to argue for recriminalizing or severely restricting h**p-derived cannabis products.
Meanwhile, alcohol—which causes roughly 178,000 deaths every year in the United States and sends countless children and adults to emergency rooms—remains legal.
Protecting children is a legitimate public health goal. Using children as the primary political justification for expanding prohibition is a different question altogether.
The real debate isn't whether accidental THC exposures have increased—they have. The debate is whether the solution is better regulation and responsible storage or a return to prohibition.
What do you think? Should Congress focus on child safety regulations, or is this really about rolling back legal cannabis and h**p products?
Gaston County Community Talk