06/25/2026
Another day, another few hundred experts on social mediaâŚ..
Somehow having the unpopular opinion that âno one really knows whatâs going to happenâ really gets under the skin of those completely and utterly convinced they know.
Todayâs internet debate is about how the Canadian Citizen Act of 1947 plays into recent conversations about citizenship by descent. When I opined that âno one really knows,â this was interpreted that I was âon the sideâ of those arguing for unlimited citizenship (Im not). But I did like my reply enough to post it here, as I believe the most ethical route includes admitting what one does not knowâŚ..
âI am not saying there is an explicit philosophy of jus soli here. I am merely amused at the hundreds of experts all arriving at different conclusions based on their years of experience googling the 1947 and 1914 Acts.
As weâve seen even the lawyers get it wrong. IRCC is clearly divided into factions, and the media doesnât know who to believe, not that they actually care.
I have no strong opinion either way because there are, indeed, several ways to interpret the statutes as written, the case law behind those statutes, the limited and often conflicting guidance of IRCC and, of course, the contributions of the social media members who are, naturally, the real and reliable experts.
If I were a betting man, Iâd wager nothing on any one of these opinions; weâre all going to have to wait until this plays out in the courts and in Parliament.
Those that end up right all along will have been so by chance and circumstance, and likely not because of their expert social media intuition.â
I refuse to make things up or âguess.â
Clients have to make the best informed decisions based on the best information actually known at the time. Social media remains an arid desert for the cultivation of best information. đ¤Łđđ¤Łđ