09/03/2026
“Interventional psychiatry” has been part of the field’s vocabulary for years, but there has never been a formal definition of what it really means.
Our new paper published in Nature Mental Health, “Defining interventional psychiatry: A framework for professional identity and practice evolution,” offers a clear framework for what the field is, what distinguishes it, and how it should evolve.
Nine leaders spanning clinical practice, research, academia, and industry came together to develop it: William Sauvé, MD, Thomas Insel MD, Brittany Albright MD, MPH, DABOM, Martha B. Koo, M.D., LFAPA, FASAM, FCTMSS, Rob Berman, Stephen M. Stahl, MD, PhD, DSc(Hon), DMedSci (Hon, Cambridge), Husseini Manji, MD, FRCPC, Roger McIntyre, and Jimmy Qian.
Their central argument is simple: interventional psychiatry is not defined by a list of tools or procedures. It is defined by the integration of psychiatric judgment with the direct delivery or oversight of specialized treatments, including responsibility for patient selection, real-time management, and longitudinal care.
The paper also proposes a risk-based framework for training and credentialing, with standards matched to procedural complexity and safety rather than a one-size-fits-all certification model.
Osmind is proud to support more than 1,000 interventional psychiatry practices nationwide. A clearer definition can help establish the field’s boundaries, strengthen its professional identity, and guide the next chapter of training, practice, and patient care.