What are the opening hours?

Monday 9am - 5pm Tuesday 9am - 5pm Wednesday 9am - 5pm Thursday 9am - 5pm Friday 9am - 5pm

https://www.parathyroidatlanta.com/contact/

ParathyroidAtlanta, 1472 Montreal Road Suite 303, Tucker, GA (2026)

06/05/2026

Why Am I So Tired? One Common Cause Patients Miss

Feeling tired all the time is one of the most common complaints patients bring to the doctor. The problem is that fatigue can come from almost anything. Stress, poor sleep, aging, medications, thyroid problems, anemia, depression, and dozens of other issues can all play a role. But there is one cause many patients do not know about: high calcium from primary hyperparathyroidism.

Fatigue and weakness are recognized symptoms of primary hyperparathyroidism, even though the condition is often first found on routine blood work rather than because of dramatic symptoms.
Primary hyperparathyroidism occurs when one or more parathyroid glands are overactive and produce too much parathyroid hormone, or PTH. That causes the calcium level in the blood to rise. Some patients develop classic problems like kidney stones or osteoporosis, but many do not. Instead, they just feel worn down, foggy, achy, weak, or not quite themselves. Fatigue may be one of the earliest or most overlooked clues.

The challenge is that fatigue is a subjective symptom. There is no scan or single questionnaire that proves high calcium is the reason a person feels drained. That said, the symptom still matters. In real practice. Many patients with hyperparathyroidism report low energy, poor concentration, and a general sense that something is off. Recent data and surgical guidance have increasingly acknowledged that neurocognitive and quality-of-life symptoms can be part of the disease, even if not every guideline uses them as a strict stand-alone indication in the same way as kidney stones or osteoporosis.
So how do you know whether fatigue could be due to a parathyroid problem? The first step is not a scan. It is the lab work. If the calcium is high and the PTH level is also high, or “inappropriately normal” when it should be low, that supports a diagnosis of primary hyperparathyroidism. If the calcium is high and the PTH is suppressed, then the parathyroid glands are acting normally and another cause of the high calcium should be considered. The diagnosis is biochemical. Imaging is used later to help plan surgery, not to make the diagnosis.

It is also important to be realistic. Not every tired patient has hyperparathyroidism, and not every patient with hyperparathyroidism is tired because of it. But when a patient has persistent fatigue along with high calcium, that possibility should not be brushed aside. In some patients, the lab findings and the symptom pattern fit together very well.

If primary hyperparathyroidism is identified in the setting of fatigue that is otherwise unexplained, surgery is a clear choice in most cases. In addition, it is appropriate to determine whether it may already be affecting the patient’s life, kidneys, bones, or overall well-being. Surgery is the only definitive cure for primary hyperparathyroidism. And the good news is that many patients with fatigue due to primary hyperparathyroidism have significant improvement in their symptoms after surgery.

The bottom line is simple: if you are tired all the time and your calcium is high, do not assume it is unrelated. Fatigue is common, but one cause patients often miss is primary hyperparathyroidism. Sometimes the answer is as simple as a routine blood test.

Disclaimer
This article is for general education only and is not personal medical advice. Individual recommendations depend on a patient’s history, laboratory findings, symptoms, and overall clinical situation.

06/02/2026

What Tests Do I Really Need Before I Decide on Parathyroid Surgery?

Patients often ask this question after they learn their calcium is high. That is the right question. The answer is that the decision almost always starts with the lab work, but it should also include the patient’s symptoms and any signs that the disease may already be affecting the kidneys, bones, or other organs. Primary hyperparathyroidism is fundamentally a biochemical diagnosis. Imaging and additional studies can be helpful, but they do not make the diagnosis.

1. The most important tests are the calcium and PTH levels.
In most cases, the key decision point comes from the blood work. If the calcium is high and the parathyroid hormone level is also high, or “inappropriately normal” when it should be suppressed, that is the central evidence for primary hyperparathyroidism. In many patients, those labs already make the diagnosis clear enough that surgery can be discussed seriously right away. The scan does not make that decision. The blood work does. You will note that ultrasounds and Sestamibi scans are not even mentioned in this article. These scans really are only utilized in planning an operation and need not be done prior to that.

2. Symptoms matter, even when they are subjective.

Not every patient presents with kidney stones or obvious osteoporosis. Many patients come in because they feel tired, foggy, run down, achy, anxious, or just not quite themselves. These symptoms are not always easy to measure, but they are still part of the decision-making. They often fit with what we see in patients with hyperparathyroidism. When the lab findings are convincing and the patient is having symptoms that may reasonably be related to high calcium, that often strengthens the case for surgery even if no other test has yet been done. Current guidelines note that neurocognitive and quality-of-life symptoms are recognized clinically, even though they are not always used as strict formal criteria the same way kidney or bone findings are.

3. Additional testing can show whether the disease is already affecting the body.

Once the diagnosis looks likely, the next question is whether the hyperparathyroidism may already be causing systemic problems. That is where tests such as kidney function, kidney imaging, 24-hour urine calcium, and bone density can become useful. A history of kidney stones, silent stones seen on imaging, reduced kidney function, or bone loss on DEXA all strengthen the argument that the disease is not just a lab abnormality. These findings are well-established reasons to recommend surgery.

4. In most patients, these extra tests do not determine whether surgery is needed. They help show how far the disease has progressed.

This is an important practical point. In many patients, the calcium and PTH pattern is already convincing enough, and the overall picture already supports surgery without waiting for a 24-hour urine calcium or a bone density test. Those tests are still worthwhile because they can document whether there has already been progression to kidney or bone involvement. But in most straightforward cases, they do not change the overall recommendation for surgery. They add information, more than changing the basic conclusion.

5. Borderline cases are where the extra testing can matter most.
When the labs are only mildly abnormal, the additional studies can help move the decision one way or the other. For example, a patient with only modest calcium elevation but a history of kidney stones and high urinary calcium may look very different once that full picture is known. Likewise, a patient with borderline lab findings who already shows osteopenia or osteoporosis on DEXA may have a stronger reason to move toward surgery sooner rather than later. Current guidance includes renal stones, hypercalciuria, osteoporosis, vertebral fracture, and reduced kidney function among the findings that can support operative management.

In Summary

So what tests do you really need before deciding on parathyroid surgery? First, you need the right lab evaluation to establish whether the high calcium is truly coming from a parathyroid problem. After that, the decision is supported by the patient’s symptoms and by whether there is evidence that the disease is already affecting the kidneys or bones. In many cases, the diagnosis and the recommendation for surgery are already fairly clear from the labs and the overall clinical picture. Additional testing is often helpful, but it is most valuable for showing the impact of the disease and for clarifying borderline situations.

Disclaimer
This article is for general education only and is not personal medical advice. Individual recommendations depend on a patient’s history, laboratory findings, symptoms, imaging, and overall clinical situation.

04/27/2026

Five Things to Know About Whether Surgeons Need to See All Four Parathyroid Glands

Patients who are looking into parathyroid surgery often notice something confusing. Some surgeons talk about finding all four parathyroid glands during surgery. Others do not. That can make it sound as if one approach is clearly right and the other is clearly wrong. Both approaches can be appropriate. The best plan depends on the diagnosis, the imaging, the likelihood of more than one abnormal gland, and the surgeon’s judgment and experience. Both focused parathyroidectomy and bilateral exploration are accepted operations with high cure rates.

1. Not every parathyroid operation requires seeing all four glands.
In many patients with primary hyperparathyroidism, the problem is a single abnormal gland. Statistically speaking, 80-90% of patients with primary hyperparathyroidism only have one abnormal gland. When the diagnosis is clear and the preoperative imaging points convincingly to one gland, many surgeons choose to perform a focused operation directed at that area rather than exploring the entire neck. A focused operation should be supplemented with checking the PTH level in the operating room to confirm a sufficient drop.

2. There are good reasons some surgeons do look for all four glands.
A broader exploration may be especially useful when imaging is negative, when imaging studies disagree, when there is concern that more than one gland may be abnormal, or when the findings during surgery do not fit the expected picture. In those situations, identifying all four glands can help the surgeon understand whether the disease involves one gland or several. Guidelines specifically note that the possibility of multigland disease should always be considered, and minimally invasive surgery is not routinely recommended when multigland disease is known or suspected.

Surgeons who find all four glands typically place less emphasis on the preoperative imaging, and usually do not use intraoperative PTH monitoring routinely. Surgeons have some options for being sure they have found all four glands, including visual cues, use of radioisotopes given right before surgery (just like a sestamibi scan), probes that leverage a unique autofluorescence exhibited by parathyroids, or frozen sections during surgery. Each option has some advantages and disadvantages. Individual surgeon experience with these various options is probably what has led to the spectrum of techniques used for parathyroid surgery, rather than all surgeons doing the same thing.

3. Looking for all four glands has advantages, but it also has tradeoffs.
The main advantage is completeness. A surgeon who examines all four glands may be less likely to miss multigland disease. The tradeoff is that a wider exploration usually means more dissection. In contrast, focused exploration may be associated with shorter operative time and lower risk of hoarseness, low calcium levels, or thyroid stimulation, in selected patients.

One indirect benefit for four gland exploration is the increased experience with finding parathyroid glands. Normal and dormant glands typically can almost be "camouflaged" in the fatty tissues behind the thyroid gland. Experience gained in locating these glands can increase the ability to find both normal and abnormal glands in future cases.

4. A focused operation is not “lesser” surgery.
Some patients worry that if the surgeon does not identify all four glands, the operation is somehow incomplete. That is not necessarily true. In an appropriately selected patient, a focused parathyroidectomy can be an excellent operation. The key is patient selection. When the labs are clear, imaging looks conclusive, and the case appears to involve a single abnormal gland, a focused approach may be a reasonable plan.

5. The better question is not “Do you always see all four glands?” but “How do you decide?”
That is usually the most helpful question for a patient to ask. A thoughtful surgeon should be able to explain why a focused exploration is appropriate in one patient and why a broader exploration makes more sense in another. Good parathyroid surgery is not defined by one rigid rule. It is defined by making the right diagnosis, choosing the right operative plan, and giving the patient the best chance of cure with the least unnecessary dissection.

In summary
If you are reading about parathyroid surgery online, do not be alarmed if different surgeons describe different methods. That does not automatically mean one of them is wrong. In many cases, it reflects different but reasonable ways of treating the same condition. What matters most is whether the approach fits your case and whether the surgeon can explain the reasoning clearly.

Disclaimer
This article is for general education only and is not personal medical advice. Individual recommendations depend on a patient’s full history, laboratory findings, imaging, and overall clinical situation.

04/09/2026

Five Things to Know About Intraoperative PTH Monitoring

Patients often hear about intraoperative PTH monitoring and wonder whether it is required for parathyroid surgery.

Here are 5 practical points:

(1) It is a tool, not the whole operation.
Its role is to help confirm that the overactive parathyroid gland or glands have been removed.

(2) Some surgeons use it routinely. Others use it selectively.
That often depends on the case, the imaging, and the surgeon’s own approach.

(3) It can provide real-time feedback during surgery.
Because PTH levels usually fall quickly after removal of the abnormal gland, it can help confirm that the operation is working.
It has limitations.

(4) It can add time and cost, and the results still have to be interpreted in the context of the whole case.

(5) The most important question is not just whether it is used, but why.
A good surgical plan should make sense for the individual patient.

Different surgeons may use different methods, but the goal is the same: to treat hyperparathyroidism safely and effectively.

04/06/2026

How do you know if high calcium is coming from a parathyroid problem?

The most important test is the parathyroid hormone level (PTH).

Here is the key idea:

If your calcium is high, your parathyroid glands should normally respond by making very little PTH.

So:

High calcium + high PTH strongly suggests primary hyperparathyroidism
High calcium + “normal” PTH may also suggest hyperparathyroidism, because the PTH should actually be low
High calcium + low PTH usually means the parathyroid glands are responding normally, and the high calcium may be coming from some other cause

That is why doctors look at the calcium and PTH together, not just one number by itself.

Other tests may also help, including:

vitamin D
kidney function
urine calcium
bone density

One more important point: scans do not make the diagnosis. Imaging is often used later to help plan surgery, but the diagnosis of primary hyperparathyroidism comes from the lab findings.

If your calcium is repeatedly high, it is worth finding out why.

03/27/2026

A routine blood test shows high calcium. Now what?

Many people feel fine when this is first discovered. Others have symptoms like fatigue, brain fog, kidney stones, or bone loss and do not realize calcium may be part of the explanation.

A single mildly high calcium does not always mean there is a major problem. Dehydration, lab variation, medications, and other conditions can sometimes affect the result. But if the calcium is repeatedly high, it deserves attention.

In many cases, the next important step is to check the parathyroid hormone (PTH) level at the same time.

Here is the key point:
If calcium is high, the parathyroid glands should normally turn PTH down.
If the PTH is still high, or even “normal” when it should be low, that strongly points to primary hyperparathyroidism.

Age matters too. In younger adults, calcium levels can sometimes run a little higher. But in many middle-aged and older adults, a calcium level that stays above about 10 mg/dL should not be ignored.

If repeat testing confirms hyperparathyroidism, the evaluation may also include:
• vitamin D
• kidney function
• urine calcium
• bone density

The goal is not just to explain the number. It is to understand whether high calcium may already be affecting your bones, kidneys, energy, or quality of life.

If your calcium is repeatedly high, do not just file that result away. It is worth finding out why.

03/18/2026

Is there a “magic number” for high calcium?

One of the most common misunderstandings about high calcium is the idea that a slightly elevated calcium level must mean only a mild problem.

That is not always true.

When primary hyperparathyroidism is present, the calcium number by itself does not tell the whole story. What matters is whether the calcium level and the parathyroid hormone level fit the pattern of hyperparathyroidism.

Some patients are told to simply “watch it” when calcium is only modestly elevated. In some cases, follow-up may be appropriate. But a mildly elevated calcium level should not automatically be dismissed as unimportant.

Why?

Because the decision-making depends on more than one number. It may also depend on:

parathyroid hormone level

the pattern over time

bone health

kidney stone history

symptoms

age

other individual factors

Some patients have obvious symptoms. Others do not realize anything is wrong until they are evaluated more carefully.

The bottom line:
A calcium level does not have to be very high to deserve proper attention.

This post is for general education only and is not personal medical advice.

02/02/2026

What’s All the Hype About Vitamin K2?

Vitamin K2 has been getting more attention lately in relation to hyperparathyroidism, calcium, and vitamin D supplements, especially in conversations about bone health and calcium metabolism. Interestingly, despite a growing amount of information available online, vitamin K2 still lives mostly in the background when it comes to mainstream, peer-reviewed medical literature.

There are a few reasons for that. One is practical: vitamin K2 is not patentable in any meaningful way, which means there is very little financial incentive for large pharmaceutical companies to fund expensive clinical trials. As a result, you won’t see vitamin K2 featured prominently in the major journals the way you might see a new drug or device.

Another issue is that we don’t have a clearly established recommended daily allowance (RDA) for vitamin K2. Different populations consume very different amounts through diet, and the research hasn’t yet settled on a single “correct” dose. Complicating matters further, there is no widely available, reliable blood test to measure vitamin K2 levels. That makes large-scale studies harder to design and interpret.

It’s also important to clarify a common point of confusion: vitamin K2 is not the same as vitamin K1. Vitamin K1 is primarily involved in blood clotting and is what most people think of when they hear “vitamin K.” Vitamin K2, on the other hand, plays a different role—helping direct calcium to where it belongs, particularly into bones and away from soft tissues. Because they share a name, the two are often lumped together, but functionally they are quite distinct.

In my own practice, I have been recommending the addition of vitamin K2 alongside calcium and vitamin D for many years, particularly in patients concerned about bone health and calcium balance. Only more recently have other parathyroid experts begun to publicly emphasize the same approach.

Based on the available evidence and clinical experience, my personal recommendation for vitamin K2 (MK-7) supplementation is 200–300 micrograms daily. While this is not an official guideline, it reflects what I believe to be a reasonable and safe range for most adults.

As with many nutritional supplements, vitamin K2 sits at the intersection of emerging science and clinical judgment. The absence of large trials does not mean it lacks value—it often means the system has little incentive to study it.

This information is educational and not a substitute for medical advice. Talk with your own clinician about your specific situation before starting any new supplement.

01/20/2026

What if my scans are normal, but my lab work is abnormal?

It is quite common for an endocrinologist to confirm a diagnosis of primary hyperparathyroidism with lab work and then order one or more scans to look for an abnormal gland. It is important to understand that it is not necessary to see an abnormal gland on imaging before an operation to know that you have primary hyperparathyroidism. But it seems that endocrinologists tend to want to “hedge their bets” before referring a patient for surgery. In addition, there are many surgeons who don't feel comfortable considering surgery without having a scan that shows a single abnormal gland.

The most experienced parathyroid surgeons feel quite comfortable proceeding with surgery even if scans are normal. They know that if the lab work confirms the diagnosis, then they will be able to identify the abnormal gland or glands at surgery, regardless of the scan findings. The scans are quite helpful as a roadmap in preparation for surgery. But the imaging should not be the determining factor.

Why do scans sometimes look normal? Parathyroid glands are tiny and sit close to the thyroid. Normal glands are almost never seen, and a small overactive gland may blend in, or it may sit behind the thyroid or lower in the neck where it’s hard to see. Ultrasound is also operator-dependent: subtle findings can be missed by people who do not perform or read these tests often. An expert review can sometimes spot clues that others overlook. Although an abnormal parathyroid gland might not be seen on a sestamibi scan if it sits behind the thyroid (its usual location), it is hard to miss if it sits somewhere else. It is important for the surgeon to know if an abnormal gland is in an ectopic location, because those are the ones that might not be found even by an experienced surgeon. As long as the sestamibi scan doesn't show an abnormal location for the parathyroid gland, the surgeon can confidently go ahead with surgery, even if the scan is read as normal.

Bottom line: Don’t delay treatment you need while waiting for a scan to “light up.” If your labs confirm primary hyperparathyroidism, talk with a surgeon who treats this every week and can walk you through cure rates, risks, and next steps for you.

This information is educational and not a substitute for medical advice. Talk with your own clinician about your situation.

01/19/2026

“My Endocrinologist says I have primary hyperparathyroidism, but he wants to watch it and not refer me for surgery. Why is that?”

The history of parathyroid surgery is pretty interesting. It started over a century ago, long before we had the advanced testing we use today. Back then, there was no way to measure parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels—only serum calcium could be tested. Patients often showed up with severe bone disease or kidney stones. Without a PTH test, doctors had to rule out every other possible cause of high calcium before suspecting a parathyroid problem. Endocrinologists became the go-to specialists for sorting through all those possibilities. Only when every other cause was eliminated would they conclude an overactive parathyroid gland was to blame, and that’s when a surgeon got involved.

Fast forward to today, and things are much simpler. We have a quick blood test to check intact PTH levels. If you have four normal parathyroid glands, they won’t overproduce PTH just because your calcium is high for another reason. Now, the first step when calcium is elevated is to check PTH. If it’s not suppressed, the diagnosis of primary hyperparathyroidism can be made right away. In fact, if you’re generally healthy and your calcium is consistently high, chances are good that’s the issue—so it’s smart to check this first.

Still, many primary care doctors send patients with high calcium to an endocrinologist, and some endocrinologists keep running through all the old possible causes even when it’s unnecessary if the PTH is already too high. They might diagnose primary hyperparathyroidism but downplay it, telling the patient, “It’s not that bad, let's just follow it”.

This likely comes from a time when parathyroid surgery wasn’t as safe or routine as it is today in skilled hands. They may not realize how symptomatic these patients can be, even when calcium and PTH levels aren’t “that high.” The truth is, parathyroid surgery is highly effective and very safe when performed by experienced surgeons. Most people with primary hyperparathyroidism have symptoms that can improve, often significantly, after a straightforward operation.

Maybe your endocrinologist ordered scans to locate an abnormal parathyroid gland, but they came back negative. So, what happens next? Stay tuned.

ParathyroidAtlanta

06/05/2026

06/02/2026

04/27/2026

04/09/2026

04/06/2026

03/27/2026

03/18/2026

02/02/2026

01/20/2026

01/19/2026

Address

Opening Hours

Telephone

Website

Alerts

Shortcuts

Share

Category

Monday	9am - 5pm
Tuesday	9am - 5pm
Wednesday	9am - 5pm
Thursday	9am - 5pm
Friday	9am - 5pm