10/06/2026
A reflection, for the clinicians who follow this account, and for anyone curious about what the work actually asks of the person doing it.
Therapy is one of the few professions where the practitioner is the instrument. There is no tool between you and the work. The capacity to be present, to attune, to hold formulation while staying responsive, to co-regulate without losing your own ground, this is the entire intervention. Which means the clinician’s state, week after week, is the limiting factor on what the work can be.
The literature on therapist burnout (Simionato & Simpson, 2018, systematic review) consistently identifies workload, emotional demand, and the administrative burden of private practice as primary drivers: not, notably, difficult clients or compassion fatigue in the way the lay framing suggests. The structural conditions of the work matter more than the content of it.
If you are a clinician reading this and recognising yourself, you are not failing at the work. You are doing it.
If you are someone considering therapy and this gives you a window into what your psychologist is holding, that’s also useful. The work is worth what it costs, on both sides of the room.
*Composite reflection. Not specific to any one practice.