09/14/2026
If you are filing an employment case against an out-of-state defendant, removal to federal court is almost guaranteed. And it matters more than most attorneys realize.
Federal court requires a unanimous jury verdict to win. It draws jurors from entire districts, including more conservative counties. It limits your voir dire and gives you fewer peremptory challenges.
State court is a significantly better venue for plaintiffs in employment cases.
The most effective way to stay in state court is to name an individual defendant and destroy diversity of citizenship. Defamation, harassment, wage claims under Labor Code 558, and intentional infliction of emotional distress can all get you there.
You should also never plead a specific damages amount in your complaint. It makes it harder for the defense to satisfy the $75,000 federal jurisdiction threshold required for removal.
If removal cannot be avoided, the case can still be won. But the strategy has to change from day one.
I cover the full approach, including how to use FRCP Rule 26 and the magistrate judge system to your advantage, in my full article.
Read the full article here: https://www.advocatemagazine.com/article/2024-november/employment-law-litigation-strategies-in-federal-court
Attorney Advertisement
This post is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by reading or responding to this content.
Joshua Cohen Slatkin, Esq. is responsible for this communication.