10/29/2026
What makes a professional assessment report defensible?
We often hear that our reports need to be clear, objective and defensible. Yet what does defensible actually mean in everyday professional practice?
Consider a report that contains thorough assessment findings and reasonable recommendations.
If another professional reviews that report and reaches a different conclusion, does that mean the original report was not defensible?
Or is defensibility more about whether the assessor has clearly documented the evidence considered, the professional reasoning applied, and how the conclusions were reached?
I think this is an important distinction, particularly when our reports may be reviewed by insurers, legal professionals, other clinicians, or decision-makers years after they were written.
I am curious how others approach this in their practice.
When you review a professional report, what makes you confident that its conclusions can withstand scrutiny?