14/08/2026
Parental alienation is an ugly subject. It seems to have more layers than an onion and more arms than an octopus.
What looks like alienation is not always alienation. A child’s rejection of a parent can develop within a complicated family system. There may be inappropriate influence by one parent, but there may also be harmful parenting, psychological abuse, fear, or a parent genuinely believing they are protecting their child — sometimes described as protective gatekeeping.
When appointed in divorce and family matters, I am at times concerned by reports where far-reaching recommendations appear to be based predominantly on interviews with parents and children.
In my view, serious allegations affecting a child’s relationship with a parent require something closer to a forensic investigation.
This means testing competing explanations rather than starting with a conclusion. It may include detailed assessment of relevant family members, appropriate psychometrics, observation of parent-child interactions, collateral information from several sources, records and consideration of the family’s history, culture and development.
No single interview, test, or allegation can adequately explain the complexity of an entire family system. In practice, however, this level of depth is difficult to achieve. Social workers and Family Advocates often carry very large caseloads, while a comprehensive independent psychological investigation can cost well over R100 000.
Yet the decisions can affect a child and their relationships for years.
A well-researched assessment cannot provide absolute certainty. It can, however, give a Court a more balanced understanding, consider alternative explanations and make recommendations grounded in evidence rather than allegation.
Ultimately, the question should not be: What does either parent want?
It should be: What best serves this particular child?